摘要
如果要保障民事纠纷得到正当的解决,一国民事诉讼就需要建立一套保障案件真实的制度。对此,我国民事诉讼也不例外。从我国民事诉讼法历史沿革的角度看,苏俄和民国时期的案件真实保障制度直接或者间接地影响着我国民事诉讼法的发展。目前我国的民事诉讼法改革应当面对这两者的影响,注意两者的区别,避免两者的混用,并结合我国民事权利实现特点,构建一套可以确保当事人权利实现稳定的案件真实保障制度。
To guarantee the justifiable solution of the civil disputes, a system is needed to be set up in civil procedure law in a country to guarantee the truth of a case. China has no exception. According to the development of civil procedure law in China, the systems in Soviet Union and the systems of the Republic of China, directly or indirectly, influenced the development of ours. At present, Chinese civil procedure law reform must confront to the influence of these two, focus on the differences and confusions, and combining with the Chinese features, set up a series of systems to guarantee the civil right of every party.
出处
《四川警察学院学报》
2015年第1期81-90,共10页
Journal of Sichuan Police College
关键词
民事案件
案件真实
证明标准
辩论原则
证明责任
推定
Truth of a Case
Evidence Standard
Principle of Debate
Evidence Responsibility
Presumption
作者简介
杜若英，北京大学法学院201l级博士生，柏林洪堡大学公派联合培养博士研究生，在此感谢国家留学基金委和汉斯．赛德尔基金会对联合培养项目的奖学金支持。
