期刊文献+

珠江流域西江支流贺江水体硅藻群落结构、分布和评估 被引量:1

Distribution and evaluation of diatom community in Hejiang River,a branch of Xijiang River,Pearl River basin
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 综合运用TWINSPAN数量分类和DCA排序方法评估了贺江流域硅藻群落,结合硅藻生物指数(IBD)、硅藻属指数(IDG)、硅藻营养化指数(TDI)和特定污染敏感指数(IPS)对其结果进行进一步验证.结果显示,TWINSPAN将贺江流域的38个样点分为4组,且群落Ⅰ到群落Ⅳ其生境质量逐渐变得单一,人为干扰程度逐渐加大;划分的四组群落在DCA排序图上有明显的界限,依据Van Dam硅藻生态指示意义,水环境污染程度从群落Ⅰ到群落Ⅳ逐渐加剧,有争议的样点7、8和24在DCA排序图上也倾向于群落Ⅲ.4种硅藻指数都是显著相关的,但IBD、IPS、IDG在硅藻群落的箱型图中明显呈现出合理的趋势.以上研究表明,划分的硅藻群落较好地反映了贺江流域的生态质量,IBD、IPS、IDG适合于贺江流域生物监测与评价. The diatom communities of Hejiang River,a branch of Xijiang River,Pearl River basin were evaulated by means of twoway indicator species analysis and detrended correspondence analysis. The diatom indexes of Generic Diatom Index( IDG),Biological diatom index( IBD),Specific Pollution sensitivity Index( IPS) and Trophic Diatom Index( TDI) were then further used to validate the conclusion. According to TWINSPAN,the 38 sampling sites of Hejiang River were classified into 4 types,the quality of ecological habitat and human disturbance were getting worse and worse from community Ⅰto community Ⅳ; the obvious boundaries of four communities existed on DCA ordination diagram,the ecological value of Van Dam showed that water environmental pollution gradually increased from Ⅰto Ⅳ,the controversial samples of 7,8 and 24 tended to community Ⅲ on DCA ordination diagram.The results indicated that the divided diatom communities can better reflect the ecological quality,in addition,IBD,IPS,IDG can be applied for monitoring and evaluating rivers in Hejiang River.
出处 《湖泊科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第1期86-93,共8页 Journal of Lake Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(40971280 30870345)资助
关键词 硅藻群落 TWINSPAN分类 DCA排序 硅藻指数 贺江 西江 珠江流域 Diatom community two-way indicator species analysis detrended correspondence analysis diatom indexes Hejiang River Xijiang River Pearl River basin
作者简介 姚文婷(1990-),女,硕士研究生;E—mail:602632774@qq.com. 通信作者;E—mail:caidesuo@vipl63.com.
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1何琦,韦桂峰,刘静,林秋奇,顾继光,韩博平.增江底栖硅藻种类多样性及分布特征[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2011,19(3):245-253. 被引量:9
  • 2Coste M, Boutry S, Tison-RoseberyJ et al. Improvements of the Biological Diatom Index ( BDI) : Description and efficiency of the new version( BDI-2006) . Ecological Indicators ,2009,9: 621.fi50.
  • 3Kelly MG. Use of the trophic diatom index to monitor eutrophication in rivers. Water Research, 1998,32: 236-242.
  • 4Cemagref. Etude des methods biologiques d'appreciation quantitative de la qualite des eaux. Rapport Q. E. Lyon. Lyon: Agence de l'eau Rhone-Mediterranee-Corse-Cemagref, 1982.
  • 5Coste M, Ayphassorho H. Tude de la qualitedes eaux du Bassin Artois-Picardie al'aide des communautes de diatomees benthiques (application des indices diatomiques). Rapport Cemagref. Douai , Bordeaux-Agence de l'Eau ArtoisPicardie, 1991.
  • 6Passy SI, Bode RW. Diatom model affinity(DMA) ,a new index for water quality assessment. Hydrobiologia, 2004,524: 241-251.
  • 7Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H. Bacillariophyceae. Berlin: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag GmbH Heidelberg, 2000.
  • 8Van Dam H, Mertens A, SinkeldamJ. A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands. NetherlandsJournal of Aquatic Ecology, 1994,28(1) : 117 -\33.
  • 9Fore SL, Grafe C. Using diatoms to assess the biological condition of large rivers in Idaho ( USA). Freshwater Biology, 2002,47:2015-2037.
  • 10Urrea G, Sabater S. Epilithic diatom assemblages and their relationship to environmental characteristics in an agricultural watershed(Guadiana River,SW Spain). Ecological Indicators, 2009,9:693-703.

二级参考文献160

共引文献201

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部