摘要
《反不正当竞争法》修订在即,现有法律对于一般条款的适用主体规定较少,给实践带来不少问题。在一般条款的权力主体选择上,应当采取司法机关与行政机关并行的双向模式,其中应当树立司法机关的主导地位。对于司法对行政的监督,应当根据我国行政机关本身的情况作出最为合适的规定。而在权力主体层级的选择上,应当针对不同机关的不同特点,做出不同的设计。行政机关适用一般条款,应由层次最高的国家工商行政管理部门作为权力主体,司法机关适用一般条款,可由中级以上人民法院作为适用主体。未来的一般条款应当将消费者作为权利主体,赋予消费者依据一般条款提起诉讼的权利,这种权利的行使一般采用消费者协会代为诉讼的方式,以更好地保护消费者、经营者利益,促进市场发展。
There are not many provisions for the general terms and the subject of application in the present Anti-Unfair Competition Law,which brings problems in practice. Both the judicial branch and administration organ should be taken as the power subject in general terms,and the judiciary should be in the leading position. Provisions on judiciary inspection of the administration should be made according to the circumstances in China. The hierarchy of power subject should be determined according to the characteristics of different administration organs. When applying general terms to administration organs,the national industrial and commercial administration department should be the power subject. When applying general terms to the judiciary,the Intermediate People＇s Court or court at higher level should be the subject of application. General terms in the future should take the consumer as the subject of right which will give the consumers the right to bring proceedings in accordance with the general terms. Consumer associations will generally exercise such rights on behalf of the consumers in order to better protect the interests of consumers and operators and promote the development of the market.
出处
《西南石油大学学报（社会科学版）》
2015年第2期66-71,共6页
Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Social Sciences Edition)
作者简介
晋威（1991-），男（汉族），河南郸城人，硕士研究生，研究方向：经济法学。
