期刊文献+

疏叶骆驼刺和多枝柽柳不同时期光合特性日变化及其与环境因子的关系 被引量:16

Photosynthetic Characteristics of Alhagi sparsifolia and Tamarix ramosissimaand the Relevant Environment Factors in Different Periods
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 在自然条件下,利用Li-6400光合仪测定疏叶骆驼刺(Alhagi sparsifolia Shap.)和多枝柽柳(Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb.)7-9月份的气体交换参数,分析2种植物净光合速率(Pn)与环境因子——光合有效辐射(PAR)、空气温度(Ta)、大气CO2浓度(Ca)、相对湿度(RH)之间的关系,以明确影响其光合作用的主导环境因子,为恢复和重建过渡带植被提供理论依据。结果显示:(1)疏叶骆驼刺不同时期Pn的日变化均为单峰曲线,多枝柽柳7、8月份的Pn日变化为单峰曲线,9月份为双峰曲线,且疏叶骆驼刺Pn的平均值(7.08μmol·m-2·s-1)高于多枝柽柳(5.54μmol·m-2·s-1)。(2)2种植物7-9月份的蒸腾速率(Tr)日变化均为单峰曲线,且疏叶骆驼刺Tr的平均值(5.46mmol·m^-2·s^-1)高于多枝柽柳(4.40mmol·m^-2·s^-1);疏叶骆驼刺和多枝柽柳的胞间CO2浓度(Ci)的日变化趋势均呈"倒钟型"曲线,与Pn日变化趋势相反。(3)2种植物7-9月份的WUE日变化进程与各自的Pn日变化规律基本一致,多枝柽柳的WUE日均值(1.21 mmol·mol^-1)明显高于疏叶骆驼刺(0.97mmol·mol-1)。(4)偏相关分析显示,骆驼刺和柽柳的Pn与PAR呈显著正相关关系,而与RH呈显著负相关关系;回归分析显示,骆驼刺和柽柳Pn日变化的变异分别有35.6%和42.4%是由环境因子的日变化造成的;通径分析显示,各环境因子对Pn都具有显著的影响,其大小顺序分别为:Ta〉RH〉PAR〉Ca(骆驼刺)和PAR〉Ca〉Ta〉RH(柽柳),且骆驼刺在7-9月份内PAR均为决策变量,RH为限制变量(除7月份外);而柽柳在8、9月份内PAR均是决策变量,RH、Ca是限制变量。研究表明,疏叶骆驼刺属于高光合高蒸腾低水分利用效率型,多枝柽柳属于低蒸腾低光合高水分利用效率型;7月份骆驼刺和柽柳Pn的下降主要是由于气孔限制引起,而8、9月份主要是由非气孔因素限制所致;PAR和RH是影响骆驼刺和柽柳最重要的环境因子,其次是Ca,而Ta在不同时期的影响程度不同;疏叶骆驼刺和多枝柽柳与环境协同进化过程中产生了一定的生态适应性,但柽柳的WUE明显高于骆驼刺,推测柽柳的抗旱能力强于骆驼刺。 To clear the main factor affecting photosynthesis and provide a theoretical basis for the restitution and restoration vegetation in transition zone, we determined gas exchange parameters of Alhagi sparsifolia and Tamarix ramosissima by the Li-6400 (LICOR,USA) under natural conditions from July to September, analyzed the relationship between photosynthesis and environmental factors, such as photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) ,air temperature (Ta) ,air CO2 concentration (Ca) ,air relative humidity (RH). The results show that: (1)The diurnal change pattern of Pn of A. sparsifolia is one-humped curve from July to September,while it could be expressed as a two-humped curve on July and September. The mean values of Pn were 7.08 μmol·m^-2·s^-1 and 5.54 μmol· m^-2 ·s^-1. (2)The curves of diurnal variation in Tr had one peak,the mean values of Tr were 5.46 mmol· m^-2 ·s^-1 and 4.40 mmol · m^-2·s^-1. They all exhibited an inverted bell-shaped variance in the diurnal change of Ca from July to September. (3)The diurnal change of WUE liked Po ,the mean value of WUE were 1.21 mmol· mol^-1 and 0.97 mmol · mol^-1 ,respectively. (4) Pn and PAR were positively correlated (P〈0.01), negatively associated with R H (P〈0. 01) on partial correlation analysis; the diurnal changes of Pn in A. sparsifolia and T. ramosissima were 35.6%, 42.4 respectively,which were caused by the diurnal variance of environmental factors on regression analysis; Each environmental factor has remarkable influence to Pn on path analysis, Ta〉RH〉PAR〉Co (A. sparsi- folia) and PAR〉Ca〉 Ta〉RH (T. ramosissima). Importantly,the decision variable of A. sparsi folia was PAR, and RH was the limitation variable except for July;while PAR was only the decision variable on July and September,both RH and Ca were decision variables. These analyses indicated that A. sparsifolia had high photosynthetic rate,high transpiration rate and low water use efficiency in comparison with T. ramo- sissima,to average conditions observed in late from July to September. The decline of P,, in both species was mainly due to stomatal limitation on July,while August and September might be non-stomatal limita- tion. Again,Pn of species are mainly affected PAR and RH,and the influence of Co on them is different in the whole growth period. In short,the results reflected the ecological adaptability of A. sparsifolia and T. rarnosissima in the process of cooperative evolution with the environment. Horever,the WUE of T. ramosissima was obviously higher than that of A. sparsifolia, Presumably T. ramosissima had higher drought resistance capacity than that of A. sparsifolia.
出处 《西北植物学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第1期189-198,共10页 Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica
基金 自治区科技重大专项(201130106) 国家基金委-新疆联合基金重点项目(U1203201) 国家自然科学基金(41371516)
关键词 光合特性 疏叶骆驼刺 多枝柽柳 环境因子 通径分析 photosynthetic characteristics Alhagi sparsifolia Tamarix ramosissima environment factor path analysis
作者简介 郭自春(1989-),男,在读硕士研究生,主要从事干旱区荒漠植物生理生态学研究。E—mail:guozichun1989@sina.cn 通信作者:曾凡江,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事干旱区荒漠植物生理生态学、地下生态学研究。E-mail:fjzeng369@sohu.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1GAGO J, COOPMAN R E, CABRERA H M,et al. Photosynthesis limitations in three fern species[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 2013,149 (4) :599-611.
  • 2万素梅,贾志宽,杨宝平.苜蓿光合速率日变化及其与环境因子的关系[J].草地学报,2009,17(1):27-31. 被引量:73
  • 3COLLATZ G J. Influence of certain environmental factors on photosynthesis and photorespiration in Simmondsia chinensis [J]. Planta, 1977, I34(2) : 127- 132.
  • 4LEWIS L D, LUCASH M,OLSZYK D,et al. Seasonal patterns of photosynthesis in douglas fir seedlings during the third and fourth year of exposure to elevated COz and temperature[J]. Plant , Cell and Environment,2001,24(5):539:-548.
  • 5张津林,张志强,查同刚,陈吉泉,孙阁,刘晨峰,崔令军,陈军,申李华.沙地杨树人工林生理生态特性[J].生态学报,2006,26(5):1523-1532. 被引量:38
  • 6靳甜甜,傅伯杰,刘国华,胡婵娟,苏常红,刘宇.不同坡位沙棘光合日变化及其主要环境因子[J].生态学报,2011,31(7):1783-1793. 被引量:88
  • 7COXSON D S,COYLE M. Niche partitioning and photosynthetic response of alectorioid lichens from sublpine spruce-fir forest in north- central British Columbia:the role of canopy microelimate gradients[J]. The Lichenologist, 2003,35(2):157- 175.
  • 8曾凡江,张希明,李小明.骆驼刺植被及其资源保护与开发的意义[J].干旱区地理,2002,25(3):286-288. 被引量:61
  • 9张媛,屠鹏飞.多枝柽柳化学成分研究[J].中草药,2006,37(12):1764-1768. 被引量:28
  • 10GRIES D,FOETZKI A, AMDT S K,et al. Production of perennial vegetation in an oasis-desert transition zone in NW China-allometric estimation, and assessment of flooding and use effects[J]. Plant Ecology, 2005,181 (1) : 23 - 43.

二级参考文献457

共引文献1145

同被引文献333

引证文献16

二级引证文献118

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部