期刊文献+

低周反复荷载下高速铁路桥墩损伤评估 被引量:5

Damage Assessment of High Speed Railway Bridge Pier under Low Cyclic Loading
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以京沪高铁沿线简支梁桥桥墩为试验原型,对6个缩尺比为1∶5的桥墩试验模型进行低周反复荷载试验,并采用改进的刚度退化模型、Park-Ang模型和Mander-Cheng模型3种地震损伤模型对桥墩试验模型的损伤过程进行评估,研究不同损伤模型对高速铁路桥墩损伤的评估效果。研究表明:Park-Ang模型不能有效评估剪切破坏型桥墩的损伤状态,Mander-Cheng模型的评估结果离散性较大,而改进的刚度退化模型可以较好地评估高速铁路桥墩的损伤状态。结合桥墩试验模型的低周反复荷载试验结果,将高速铁路桥墩的损伤程度划分为基本无损伤、轻微损伤、中等损伤、严重损伤和完全损坏5个等级,并给出各损伤等级相应的损伤指数范围,各等级损伤指数的临界值分别为0,0.25,0.5和1。 Six one-fifth scale pier models were tested under low cyclic loading, whose prototypes were piers of simply supported beam bridges along Beijing-Shanghai high speed railway. The damage processes of test models were evaluated using the modified stiffness degradation model, Park-Ang damage model and Man- der-Cheng damage model, and the effectiveness of different damage models on the damage assessment of high speed railway bridge pier was studied. The results show that the Park-Ang model cannot effectively e- valuate the damage state of shear failure type pier. The evaluation results calculated by Mander-Cheng model are of higher discreteness. However, the modified stiffness degradation model can better evaluate the damage state of high speed railway bridge pier. The damage degree of high speed railway bridge pier can be classified as no damage, minor damage, moderate damage, severe damage and complete damage according to the results of low cyclic loading tests of pier models. The corresponding damage indices for each damage degree are given and the critical values for each damage degree are 0, 0.25, 0. 5 and 1 respec- tively.
出处 《中国铁道科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期28-33,共6页 China Railway Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51108027) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2011JBM271)
关键词 高速铁路 简支梁桥 桥墩 地震损伤模型 损伤评估 损伤指数 High speed railway Simply supported beam bridge Pier Seismic damage model Damageassessment Damage index
作者简介 赵冠远(1978-),男,江苏邳州人,副教授,博士。
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1BERTERO R D, BERTERO V V, BERAN-GILNORE A. Performance-Based Earthquake-Resistant Design Based on Comprehensive Design Philosophy and Energy Concepts [C] //Proceedings of llth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Mexico.. International Association of Earthquake Engineering, 1996.
  • 2WILLIAMS M S, VILLEMURE I, SEXSMITH R G. Evaluation of Seismic Damage Indices for Concrete Elements Loaded in Combined Shear and Flexure[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 1997, 94 (3):315-322.
  • 3PARK Y J, ANG A H. Mechanic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete [J]. Journal of Structural Engi- neering, ASCE, 1985, 111 (ST4): 722-739.
  • 4赵冠远,张同越,陈鑫.低周反复荷载下高速铁路桥墩抗震试验研究[J].中国铁道科学,2014,35(4):38-44. 被引量:17
  • 5LYBAS J, SOZEN M A. Effect of Beam Strength and Stiffness on Dynamic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Coupled Walls [R]. Civil Engineering Series SRS 444.Urbana: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1977.
  • 6ROUFAIEL M S L, MEYER C. Analytical Modeling of Hysteretic Behavior of R/C Frames [J]. Journal of Struc- tural Engineering, ASCE, 1987, 113 (9): 429-444.
  • 7MANDER J B, CHENG C T. Renewable Hinge Detailing for Bridge Columns [C] //Proceedings of Pacific Confe- rence on Earthquake. Australia: Australian Earthquake Engineering Society, 1995, 197-206.
  • 8PRIESTLEY M J N, SEIBLE F, CALVI G M. Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges [M]. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc, 1996.
  • 9HOSE D, SEIBLE F. Performance Evaluation Database for Concrete Bridge Components and Systems under Simula- ted Seismic Loads [R]. California. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 1999. 5-7.
  • 10PAULAY T, PRIESTLEY M J N. Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings [M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1992.

二级参考文献9

共引文献16

同被引文献75

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部