摘要
目的:探讨主动脉弓解剖分型对颈动脉支架置入术技术指标的影响。方法:回顾性分析2011-01至2012-12阜外心血管病医院连续224例单侧颈动脉支架置入术资料。记录颈动脉支架置入术中插入颈动脉的导管类别及型号、操作技术(1.回撤翻转直接插入;2.回撤翻转+导丝引导;3.回撤翻转+导丝引导+子导管支撑;4.特殊造影导管+导丝引导+子母导管)、操作X线曝光时间、对比剂用量及操作相关并发症。主动脉弓解剖按Myla分型分为Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ三型。结果:224例患者Ⅰ型弓7例(3.1%),Ⅱ型弓113例(50.4%),Ⅲ型弓104例(46.4%)。104例Ⅲ型弓有48例(46.2%)患者使用特殊技术(技术3、4),比Ⅰ型弓1例(14.3%)、Ⅱ型弓17例(14.9%)明显增高(P<0.05);Ⅲ型主动脉弓患者较Ⅰ型弓、Ⅱ型弓患者在曝光时间、使用对比剂量及操作失败率方面均明显增多(P均<0.05);Ⅲ型弓患者手术成功率(96.2%)低于Ⅰ型弓(100%)、Ⅱ型弓(100%)患者(P<0.05)。操作相关并发症:Ⅲ型弓患者中并发症总计发生率(22.1%)高于Ⅰ型弓(0)、Ⅱ型弓(8.9%)患者(P<0.05)。结论:主动脉弓形态是影响颈动脉支架置入术技术指标的重要因素,Ⅲ型弓使颈动脉支架置入术的难度增加,并发症增多。
Objective: To explore the effect of the aortic arch type on technical indicators in patients with carotid artery stent implantation.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 224 consecutive patients treated in Fu Wai hospital for unilateral carotid artery stent implantation from 2011-01 to 2012-12. We summarized the catheter category, type and the operating techniques including ① retracement, turn and insertion of the catheter, ② retracement, turn of catheter+the guidance of guide wire,③ retracement, turn of catheter+the guidance of guide wire+the supporting of another catheter, ④ using special graphic catheter+the guidance of guide wire+the supporting of another catheter. The procedural X-ray exposure time, dosage of contrast agent and operation related complications were recorded. According to Myla classiifcation, the aortic arches were divided into Myla Ⅰ, Myla Ⅱ and Myla Ⅲ types. Results: There were 7/224 (3.1%) patients with Myla Ⅰ aortic arch, 113 (50.4%) with Myla Ⅱ aortic arch and 104 (46.4%) with Myla Ⅲ aortic arch. A total of 48/104 (46.2%) Myla Ⅲ patients used special techniques (tech③, tech④), it was more than the patients with Myla Ⅰ, (1/7,14.3%) and Myla Ⅱ (17/113, 15.0%), P〈0.01. The patients with Myla Ⅲ aortic arch had the longer X-ray exposure time and used the higher dose of contrast agent, all P〈0.01. The procedural success rate in patients with Myla Ⅲ was 96.2%, it was lower than those with Myla Ⅰ (100%) and Myla Ⅱ (100%), P=0.045. The procedural complication rate in patients with Myla Ⅲ was 22.1%, it was higher than those with Myla Ⅰ (0%) and Myla Ⅱ (8.9%), P=0.007. Conclusion: The aortic arch type is the important inlfuential factor for the techniques used in carotid stent implantation. There were more dififculties and complications for stent implantation in patients with Myla Ⅲ aortic arch.
出处
《中国循环杂志》
CSCD
北大核心
2015年第1期34-37,共4页
Chinese Circulation Journal
作者简介
沈松鹤 硕士研究生 主要研究方向:放射介入Email:shengsonghe337@163.com曾在阜外心血管病医院进修
通讯作者:蒋雄京Email:jxj103@hotmail.com