期刊文献+

主动脉弓解剖分型对颈动脉支架置入术技术指标的影响 被引量:13

Effect of Aortic Arch Type on Technical Indicators in Patients With Carotid Artery Stent Implantation
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨主动脉弓解剖分型对颈动脉支架置入术技术指标的影响。方法:回顾性分析2011-01至2012-12阜外心血管病医院连续224例单侧颈动脉支架置入术资料。记录颈动脉支架置入术中插入颈动脉的导管类别及型号、操作技术(1.回撤翻转直接插入;2.回撤翻转+导丝引导;3.回撤翻转+导丝引导+子导管支撑;4.特殊造影导管+导丝引导+子母导管)、操作X线曝光时间、对比剂用量及操作相关并发症。主动脉弓解剖按Myla分型分为Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ三型。结果:224例患者Ⅰ型弓7例(3.1%),Ⅱ型弓113例(50.4%),Ⅲ型弓104例(46.4%)。104例Ⅲ型弓有48例(46.2%)患者使用特殊技术(技术3、4),比Ⅰ型弓1例(14.3%)、Ⅱ型弓17例(14.9%)明显增高(P<0.05);Ⅲ型主动脉弓患者较Ⅰ型弓、Ⅱ型弓患者在曝光时间、使用对比剂量及操作失败率方面均明显增多(P均<0.05);Ⅲ型弓患者手术成功率(96.2%)低于Ⅰ型弓(100%)、Ⅱ型弓(100%)患者(P<0.05)。操作相关并发症:Ⅲ型弓患者中并发症总计发生率(22.1%)高于Ⅰ型弓(0)、Ⅱ型弓(8.9%)患者(P<0.05)。结论:主动脉弓形态是影响颈动脉支架置入术技术指标的重要因素,Ⅲ型弓使颈动脉支架置入术的难度增加,并发症增多。 Objective: To explore the effect of the aortic arch type on technical indicators in patients with carotid artery stent implantation.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 224 consecutive patients treated in Fu Wai hospital for unilateral carotid artery stent implantation from 2011-01 to 2012-12. We summarized the catheter category, type and the operating techniques including ① retracement, turn and insertion of the catheter, ② retracement, turn of catheter+the guidance of guide wire,③ retracement, turn of catheter+the guidance of guide wire+the supporting of another catheter, ④ using special graphic catheter+the guidance of guide wire+the supporting of another catheter. The procedural X-ray exposure time, dosage of contrast agent and operation related complications were recorded. According to Myla classiifcation, the aortic arches were divided into Myla Ⅰ, Myla Ⅱ and Myla Ⅲ types. Results: There were 7/224 (3.1%) patients with Myla Ⅰ aortic arch, 113 (50.4%) with Myla Ⅱ aortic arch and 104 (46.4%) with Myla Ⅲ aortic arch. A total of 48/104 (46.2%) Myla Ⅲ patients used special techniques (tech③, tech④), it was more than the patients with Myla Ⅰ, (1/7,14.3%) and Myla Ⅱ (17/113, 15.0%), P〈0.01. The patients with Myla Ⅲ aortic arch had the longer X-ray exposure time and used the higher dose of contrast agent, all P〈0.01. The procedural success rate in patients with Myla Ⅲ was 96.2%, it was lower than those with Myla Ⅰ (100%) and Myla Ⅱ (100%), P=0.045. The procedural complication rate in patients with Myla Ⅲ was 22.1%, it was higher than those with Myla Ⅰ (0%) and Myla Ⅱ (8.9%), P=0.007. Conclusion: The aortic arch type is the important inlfuential factor for the techniques used in carotid stent implantation. There were more dififculties and complications for stent implantation in patients with Myla Ⅲ aortic arch.
出处 《中国循环杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第1期34-37,共4页 Chinese Circulation Journal
关键词 颈动脉支架置入术 主动脉弓形态 Myla分型 Carotid artery stent implantation Aortic arch type Myla classification
作者简介 沈松鹤 硕士研究生 主要研究方向:放射介入Email:shengsonghe337@163.com曾在阜外心血管病医院进修 通讯作者:蒋雄京Email:jxj103@hotmail.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Liu M, Wu B, Wang WZ, et al. Stroke in China: epidemiology, prevention, and management strategies. Lancet Neurol, 2007, 6: 456-464.
  • 2王焱,叶涛.颈动脉内膜剥脱术和支架术的争议依旧在持续——对5个独立的国际性颈动脉治疗指南的解读[J].中国循环杂志,2012,27(S01):16-18. 被引量:5
  • 3Warlow C, Sudlow C, Dennis M, et al. Stroke. Lancet, 2003, 362: 1211-1224.
  • 4Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, et al. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med, 2004, 351: 1493-1501.
  • 5Brott TG, Hobson RW, Howard G, et al. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med, 2010, 363:11-23.
  • 6Pelerson BG, Resnick SA, Moraseh MD, et al. Aortic arch vessel stenting: a single-center experience using cerebral protection. Arch Surg, 2006, 141: 560-563.
  • 7蒋雄京,杨倩,杨跃进,吴海英,张慧敏,徐波,惠汝太,高润霖.心脏直视手术前颈动脉支架术的初步探讨[J].中华心血管病杂志,2008,36(10):903-906. 被引量:3
  • 8Micari A, Stbile E, Cremonesi A, et al. Carotid artery stenting in octogenaians using a proximal endovascular occlusion cerebral protection device: a muhieenter registry. Catheter Cardiovase Interv, 2010, 76: 9-15.
  • 9杨倩,蒋雄京.心脏直视手术患者并存颈动脉严重狭窄的处理[J].中国循环杂志,2008,23(2):153-154. 被引量:2
  • 10Casserly 1P, Sachar R, Yadav JS. Manual of Peripheral Vascular Intervention. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.83-90.

二级参考文献19

  • 1Dubinsky RM, Lai SM. Mortality from combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass surgery in the US. Neurology ,2007,68: 195-197.
  • 2Das SK, Brow TD,Peper J. Continuing controversy in the management of concomitant coronary and carotid disease : an overview. Int J Cardiol,2000 ,74 :47-65.
  • 3Naylor AR,Cuffe RL, Rothwell PM, et al. A systematic review of outcomes following staged and synchronous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2003 ,25 :380-389.
  • 4Yadav .IS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, et al. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med,2004, 351 : 1493-1501.
  • 5Ziada KM, Yadav JS, Mukherjee D, et al. Comparison of results of carotid stenting followed by open heart surgery versus combined carotid endarterectomy and open heart surgery. Am J Cardio1,2005,96:519-523.
  • 6Van der Heyden J, Suttorp M J, Bal ET, et al. Staged carotid angioplasty and stenting followed by cardiac surgery in patients with severe asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Circulation ,2007,116:2036-2042.
  • 7Berens ES, Kouchoukos NT, Murphy SF, et al. Preoperative carotid artery screening in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Vasc Surg, 1992,15 : 313-321.
  • 8Naylor AR, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM, et al. Carotid artery disease and stroke during coronary artery bypass: a critical review of the literature. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2002,23: 283-294.
  • 9Kallikazaros I, Tsioufis C, Sideris S, et al. Carotid artery disease as a marker for the presence of severe coronary artery disease in patients evaluated for chest pain. Stroke, 1999, 30: 1002-1007.
  • 10Ozatik MA, Gol MK, Fansa I, et al. Risk factors for stroke following coronary artery bypass operations. J Card Surg,2005,20: 52-57.

共引文献6

同被引文献82

引证文献13

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部