期刊文献+

100 MW燃煤电厂非碳基吸附剂喷射脱汞实验研究 被引量:18

Experimental study on mercury capture using non-carbon sorbents in 100 MW coal-fired power plant
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 选取一个100 MW燃煤电厂对氯化铜改性氧化铝和氯化铜改性沸石进行喷射脱汞实验,应用EPA 30B标准方法对静电除尘器(ESP)前后烟气中的汞价态分布进行了采样和测试。研究了吸附剂喷射量对烟气中汞脱除率的影响。现场测试的汞平衡结果为77.1%~111.5%。经修正的汞平衡结果表明,吸附剂喷射量越大,脱汞率越高。改性氧化铝的脱汞率最高可达30.6%,改性沸石的脱汞率最高可达29.2%。喷射非碳基吸附剂后烟气中元素汞(Hg0)显著下降,在喷射量为0.22 g·m^-3时,两种吸附剂可将烟气中Hg0比例由40%降低至22%左右,减少的Hg0主要转化为HgP。非碳基吸附剂与湿法脱硫(WFGD)系统协同使用可以有效减少Hg0向大气中的排放。 The mercury removal from the flue gas discharged from a 100 MW coal-fired power plant in China by non-carbon sorbents CuCl2 impregnated alumina and zeolite were experimentally investigated in this paper. When the sorbent were added into, the mercury speciation in flue gas across ESP was directly sampled and analyzed using EPA 30B standard method. The effect of injection rate was studied. The mercury balances measured on-site were between 77.1%-111.5%, and the results of mercury balance after correction suggested that the rates of mercury removal increased with increase of injecting amounts, and was up to 30.6% for modified alumina and 29.2% for modified zeolite. The Hg0 content in flue gas reduced considerably after sorbent injection, and decreased from 40% to 22% when the sorbent injection rate was 0.22g·m^-3. Non-carbon sorbent injection combined with WFGD system could be an effective technology for controlling mercury emission of coal-fired power plant.
出处 《化工学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第11期4413-4419,共7页 CIESC Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51376109)~~
关键词 烟道气 吸附剂 吸附 脱汞 非碳基 flue gas sorbents adsorption mercury removal non-carbon
作者简介 杜雯(1987-),女,博士研究生。 联系人
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Pavlish J H, Sondreal E A, Mann M D, Olson E S, Galbreath K C, Landal D L, Benson S A. Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plants [J]. Fuel Process. Technol., 2003, 82 (2/3): 89-165.
  • 2Naylor T B. Flue Gases Research, Technology and Economics[M]. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2009:151-202.
  • 3Pacyna E C. Pacyn J M, Sundseth K, et al. Global emission of mercury to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources in 2005 and projections to 2020 [J]. Atmos. Environ., 2010, 44:2487-2499.
  • 4Stiftung Wissenschaft tend Politik(SWP). German Institute for International and Security Affairs. The UN Minamata Convention on Mercury[S]. 2013.
  • 5Kilgroe J, Senior C. Fundamental science and engineering of mercury control in coal-fired power plants//Proceedings of Air Quality IV, International Conference on Mercury, Trace Elements, and Particulate Mattar[C]. Arlington, VA, 2003.
  • 6Cao Y, Chert B, Wu J S, Cui H, Smith J, Chen C K, Cbu P, Pan W E Study of mercury oxidation by a selective catalytic reduction catalyst in a pilot-scale slipstream reactor at a utility boiler burning bituminous coal [J]. Energy Fuels, 2007, 21:145-156.
  • 7Laudal D L, Pavlish J H, Brown T D, Galbreath K C, Thompson J S, Weber G F, Sondreal E. Pilot-scale evaluation of the impact of selective catalytic reduction for NOx on mercury speciation// Proceeding of the Air and Waste Management Association Annual Meeting[C]. Orlando, Florida, 2001.
  • 8Constance L Senior. Oxidation of mercury across selective catalytic reduction catalysts in coal-fired power plants [J]. J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc., 2006, 56:23-31.
  • 9US EPA. Information Collection Request- 1999[G]. 2000.
  • 10Srivastava R K, Hutson N, Martin B, Princiotta F, Staudt J. Control of mercury emissions from coal-fired electric utility boilers [J]. Environ. ScL TechnoL, 2006, 411(5): 1385-1393.

二级参考文献77

共引文献354

同被引文献264

引证文献18

二级引证文献99

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部