期刊文献+

腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术与传统开腹手术比较分析 被引量:16

Comparative Analysis on the Clinical Effects of Laparoscopic and Open Surgery on the Colorectal Cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:分析腹腔镜结直肠癌根治手术与传统开腹术治疗结直肠癌的临床效果,探讨腹腔镜手术的特点及优势,为临床外科手术提供参考。方法:选择2009年7月至2013年5月在我院进行腹腔镜手术的186例结直肠癌患者的临床资料进行分析,并与择期接受开腹手术的181例结直肠癌患者的临床效果进行对比。比较两组患者的平均手术时间、平均术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、下床活动时间、平均住院时间及并发症的发生率等。结果:与传统手术组相比,腹腔镜组患者的平均手术时间短、平均术中出血量少、术后肛门排气时间早、平均住院时间短,差异显著且具有统计学意义(P<0.05);腹腔镜组患者术后出现下肢静脉血栓1例、皮下气肿9例、高碳酸血症8例,并发症的发生率为7.14%;传统手术组术后出现切口感染10例、消化道出血13例,吻合口漏11例、并发症的发生率为12.90%。腹腔镜根治术患者术后并发症的发生率明显低于传统开腹手术组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);腹腔镜组患者的平均住院时间为(8.34±2.12)天,明显短于传统开腹手术组的(11.58±1.98)天,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术具有很好的临床效果,术中出血少、术后恢复快,能够减少手术对患者机体造成的损伤,值得临床推广应用。 Objective: To investigate the clinical effects of different methods for the patients with colorectal cancer and to analyze the advantages of the laparoscopic surgery so as to provide a basis for clinical research and practice. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed about the clinical data of 28 patients with colorectal cancer who were treated by the laparosCope in our hospital from July 2009 to May 2013 were selected to be the study objects. And another 31 patients with colorectal cancer who'were treated by the open surgery in our hospital were chosen to be the control group. Then the average blood loss, the operation time, the postoperative exhaustion time, the incidence of complications and the hospitalization of patients in the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results: The blood loss, the operation time, the time for exhaustion and the hospitalization of patients in the laparoscopic group were obviously better .than those of the patients in the conventional group with statistically significant differences (P〈0.05). There was statistically significant difference about the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P〈0.05). Conclusions: It is indicated that the laparoscopic surgery should be well promoted to the clinical field with the advantages of the minimally invasive trauma, less blood loss and better recovery which is suitable for the patients with colorectal cancer to make the contribution to minimizing the damages brought by the operation.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2014年第31期6145-6147,共3页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
基金 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(30901795)
关键词 腹腔镜手术 结直肠癌 传统开腹手术 临床效果 Laparoscopic surgery Colorectal cancer Open surgery Clinical effects
作者简介 张炎,主治医师,主要从事胃肠道肿物等研究 王育红,医学博士,硕士研究生导师,主任医师,教授,主要从事胃肠道肿瘤、乳腺甲状腺疾病,腹膜后肿瘤等方面的研究,E-mail:laohushanshang@163.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献89

  • 1曹其彬,胡三元.腹腔镜与开腹结直肠癌手术对机体免疫功能的比较[J].中国普通外科杂志,2006,15(8):615-618. 被引量:53
  • 2Jemal A. Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009[J]. CA Canc-er J Clin,2009,59(4):225-249.
  • 3Lezoche G, Baldarelli M, Campagnacci R, et al. Laparoscopic surgeryof rectal cancer: state of art and long-term results [J]. Arm Ital Chir,2010,81(4):265-268.
  • 4Wasserberg N. Laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer [J]. IsrMed Assoc J,2010,12(9):572-576.
  • 5Furst A, Schwandner 0,Heiligensetzer A, et al. Laparoscopie TME inrectal cancer-electronic supplementary: op-video [J]. LangenbecksArch Surg,2010,395(2):181-183.
  • 6Colon Cancer Lapamacopic of Open Resection Study Group(COLOR). Lapamscopic surgery versus open surgery for coloncancer: short-term outcomes of a randomized trial [J]. Lancet 0neol,2005,6(7):477-484.
  • 7Tjandra JJ, Chan MK, Systematic review on the short-term outcome oflapamscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer[J]. Coloree-tal Dis,2006,8(5):375-388.
  • 8Anderson C, Uman G, Pigazzi A. Oncolegic outcome of laparoscopicsurgery for rectal cancer:A systematic review and meta-analysis of theliterature [J]. FJSO,2008,34(10):1135-1142.
  • 9Fleshman J. Sargent DJ, Green E, et al. Lapamscopiecolectomy forcancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from theCOST Story Group trial [J]. Ann Surg,2007,246(7):655-662.
  • 10Yamamoto S, Fujita S, Akasu T,et al. Laparoscopic surgery fortransverse and descending colon carcinomas has comparable safety tolaparoscopic surgery for colon carcinomas at other sites [J]. Dig Surg,2009,26(6):487-492.

共引文献37

同被引文献98

引证文献16

二级引证文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部