战略构想、创新搜寻与技术创新能力演化——基于系统动力学的理论建模与仿真研究被引量：28

Strategic schema,innovation search and technological innovation capability evolution—Theoretical modeling and simulation based on system dynamics

原文传递

导出

摘要本研究基于上层梯队理论、认知理论和知识结构视角，构建了从搜寻知识到创造知识的系统动力学模型，通过量化战略构想、创新搜寻和技术创新能力之间的关系，发现了技术创新能力的演化路径和跃迁途径．第一，技术创新能力沿着“吸收能力主导一吸收、集成能力为主一吸收、集成和原创能力高水平均衡发展”的路径重构升级；第二，维持在20％-50％之间的战略构想复杂度是促进技术创新能力演化路径跃迁的重要途径．本文的发现一方面可以弥补现有实证研究在技术创新能力重构升级途径方面的不足，另一方面可以丰富系统动力学在创新管理领域的应用范围， Based on upper echelon theory, cognitive theory and knowledge structure perspective, this studyconstructed a system dynamics model about the process from knowledge search to knowledge creation.The relationship among strategic schema, innovation search and technological innovation capability isquantified. The findings are as follows first, there is an important trajectory of technological innovationcapability evolution：＂absorptive capacity dominantabsorption ＆ integration capabilities leadabsorptive,integration ＆ creation capabilities at a high level under balanced development＂; second, the complexityof strategic schema, maintaining between 20%-50%, helps to the transition of evolution trajectory oftechnological innovation1 capability. These findings can fill the existing research gap generated by empiricalresearch on technological innovation, and can enrich the application of system dynamics in the field ofinnovation management.

作者陈力田许庆瑞吴志岩

机构地区浙江工商大学工商管理学院浙江大学管理学院

出处《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第7期1705-1719,共15页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice

基金国家自然科学基金面上项目(71172115) 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71302034) 浙江省自然科学基金(Q14G020010) 教育部博士研究生学术新人奖

关键词技术创新能力演化战略构想创新搜寻系统动力学 technological innovation capability evolution strategic schema innovation search systemdynamics

分类号 F279.23 [经济管理—企业管理]

作者简介陈力田（1987-），女．汉，安徽庐江人，讲师，博士，研究方向：技术创新与战略管理，E-mail：daisy0123@126．com 许庆瑞（1930-），男，汉，江苏常州人，教授，博士生导师，研究方向：技术创新与战略管理吴志岩（1987-），男，满，辽宁沈阳人，博士研究生，研究方向：技术创新与战略管理．

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献33

1Nadkarni S, Narayanan V K. Strategic schemas, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The moderating role of industry clockspeed[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(3): 243-270.
2Cohen W M, Levinthal D A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation[J]. Adminis- trative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(1): 128-152.
3Lane P J, Koka B R, Pathak S. The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct[J]. The Academy of Management Review ARCHIVE, 2006, 31(4): 833-863.
4Yam R, Guan J C, Pun K F, et al. An audit of technological innovation capabilities in Chinese firms: Some empirical findings in Beijing, China[J]. Research Policy, 2004, 33(8): 1123-1140.
5Dutta S, Narasimhan O M, Rajiv S. Conceptualizing and measuring capabilities: Methodology and empirical application[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26(3): 277-285.
6Forsman H. Innovation capacity and innovation development in small enterprises. A comparison between the manufacturing and service sectors[J]. Research Policy, 2011, 40(5): 739-750.
7Lichtenthaler U. Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learn- ing processes[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 2009, 52(4): 822-846.
8Iansiti M, Clark K B. Integration and dynamic capability: Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1994, 3(3): 557-605.
9Smith K G, Collins C J, Clark K D. Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48(2): 346-357.
10Zhou K Z, Wu F. Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(5): 547-561.

二级参考文献72

1宁晓倩,王其藩.运用系统动力学模型进行项目时间/成本估算[J].科技导报,2004,22(9):54-57. 被引量：9
2孙朝苑,彭其渊,陈旭.企业物流作业成本控制的DEA模型[J].西南交通大学学报,2006,41(5):649-652. 被引量：7
3吴延兵.R&D存量、知识函数与生产效率[J].经济学（季刊）,2006,5(4):1129-1156. 被引量：624
4张力菠,陈杰,马义中.基于时间的VMI整合补货模式的系统成本与牛鞭效应[J].系统工程,2006,24(10):26-33. 被引量：11
5张力菠,韩玉启,陈杰.基于数量的供应商管理库存整合补货的牛鞭效应与成本研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2007,13(2):410-416. 被引量：7
6Urabe K. Innovation and the Japanese Management System[C]. In K. Urabe, J. Child, and T. Kagono ( Eds. ). Innovation and management international comparisons. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. 1988.
7Acs, Z.J. and Audretsch, D.B. Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis [J]. American Economic Review. 1988, 78(4) :678 -690.
8A. Conte and M. Vivarelli. One or Many Knowledge Production Functions? Mapping Innovation Activity Using Microdata [ EB/OL]. IZA Discussion Paper 1878,2005. http://www.iza. org.
9Griliches, Zvi. Patents : Recent Trends and Puzzles [ C ]. In Baily, Martin N. and Clifford Winston (eds), Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics. Washington, D. C. : The Brookings Institution, 1989.
10Koeller,C. T. Innovation, Market Structure and Firm Size: A Simultaneous Equations Model[ J ]. Managerial and Decision Economics. 1995, 16(3) :259-269.