摘要
目的比较引流管接负压球引流和纱布填塞引流处理乳腺癌术后皮瓣下积液伴感染的治疗效果,为临床诊治提供理论依据。方法将医院收治的20例乳腺癌术后发生皮瓣下积液伴感染患者,按随机方法分为观察组(n=10)、对照组(n=10)。观察组和对照组的手术方式相同,观察组患者使用引流管接负压球引流治疗术后感染,对照组则使用纱布填塞引流进行治疗,对比两组患者的治疗情况。结果观察组治愈时间、换药次数、切口长度、庆大霉素应用总量、克林霉素应用总量均明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论引流管接负压球引流比纱布填塞引流节约治疗时间,用药更少,有利于提高患者的生活质量。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of drainage tube suction drainage and gauze packing balls drainage for treating breast flaps effusion infection,in order to provide a theoretical basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods 20 patients of effusion flap with infections after breast cancer therapies were randomly divided into observation group（n=10） and control group（n=10）.Both observation group and control group carried out the same surgery for breast cancer,after the surgery,drainage tube were used in the observation group for negative pressure drainage treatment of postoperative infection,while gauze drainage treatment were used in the control group,the clinical results of two groups were compared. Results The length of cure time,medical prescriptions,length of incision,gentamicin amount,clindamycin amount in observation group were all significantly better than those of the control group（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Negative pressure drainage tube drainage ball takes less time and medication than gauze drainage treatment,which is helpful to improve patients′ quality of life.
出处
《中国当代医药》
2014年第20期185-186,190,共3页
China Modern Medicine
基金
河南省教育厅科学技术研究重点项目(14A320074)
