摘要
葛承雍先生认为唐《太尉秦王刀人高墓志铭》的志主——秦王刀人高惠通是"秦王李世民的女侍卫",这一观点未能揭示历史真相,反将读者引入了误区。其由志文"嗤宓妃之娇态"与"鹊巢之咏"所作出的推理欠严密。"刀人"只是隋唐时期皇帝或王的贴身女侍的一种名号,高惠通只是侍奉时为秦王的李世民宴寝起居的贴身女侍。高惠通很可能原本是一个因受亲人牵连而于窦建德集团灭亡后没入秦王宫中的世族女子,其"刀人"际遇只是历史上众多宫人悲剧人生的重复而已。作为一种难得的宫人墓志,该志的主要价值在于其可资补证"刀人"这一名号的存在时间和空间,志文中并不存在也不可能存在李世民兄弟相争及玄武门之变的任何蛛丝马迹。
Ge Chengyong points out that "Daoren " Gao Huitong was a female guard of Li Shimin—Prince Qin of the Tang Dynasty. But he fails to reveal the truth. Instead, readers are misled. His conclusion made from"laughing at Fufei’s delicacy" and "song of magpie nest" is not persuasive enough. " Daoren " was the title of maids who only served emperors or princes in the Sui and Tang dynasties. "Daoren" Gao Huitong was thus a maid of Li Shimin. Gao Huitong was likely a common woman who was forced to serve for the palace after she had been implicated by her relatives. Her life was a tragedy like many other palace maids. This rare palace maid’s epitaph helps prove the time and scope of the title "Daoren". The epitaph does not contain any traces about the struggles between Li Shimin and his brothers, nor about the " Xuanwu Gate Incident".
出处
《历史教学问题》
CSSCI
2018年第6期39-45,136,共8页
History Research And Teaching
基金
国家社科基金重大项目"<诗经>与礼制研究"(2016ZDA172)子课题"<诗经>与宾礼军礼嘉礼共生互动研究"阶段性成果
作者简介
段锐超,陕西理工大学文学院讲师(邮编723000)。
