期刊文献+

威客模式下影响众包发布方创新绩效的因素研究 被引量:2

Research on Factors That Influence the Innovation Performance in Witkey Model
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以威客模式众包为研究对象,采用实证方法研究影响发布方创新绩效的主要因素。分析并构建发布方创新绩效影响因素的理论模型,提出了研究假设,利用从任务中国网站抓取的1 400条悬赏任务数据,验证模型假设。实证分析表明发布方在合理提升任务奖金的同时,在任务时长和任务描述长度的设计上需要平衡所期望获得的解决方案的数量和质量;而发布方的经验对解答方案的数量和质量均无正向影响,发布方需要通过提升自身的信用提升绩效。 Taken Witkey model as the research object,the factors that influence the innovation performance of the crowdsourcing are studied from the perspective of the seekers. First,the influencing factor model is constructed,the research hypothesis is put forward,and the measurement method of the variable in the model is designed. Then based on the actual data collected from " Task CN"( http://www. taskcn. com/),the corresponding regression model is selected to analyze the influencing factors model. The results of the data analysis show: Seekers should increase the task award rationally. Meanwhile seekers should balance the quantity and quality of solution when they design the task duration and its description length. Improving seeker’ s credit is an effective way to improve the performance of seeker.
作者 梅姝娥 孙成 Mei Shu'e;Sun Cheng(School of Economics & Management,Southeast University,Nanjing 2100961China)
出处 《科技管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第24期183-188,共6页 Science and Technology Management Research
基金 国家社科基金资助项目"电子商务中基于隐私信息经济性的隐私信息保护和应用策略研究"(17BGL196)
关键词 众包 威客模式 创新绩效 影响因素 发布方 crowdsourcing Witkey model innovation performance influencing factors seeker
作者简介 梅姝娥(1968-),女,江苏如东人,博士,教授,主要研究方向为信息管理与信息系统、电子商务、创新管理等;孙成(1992-),女,安徽池州人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为电子商务
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献61

  • 1韩建军,程玉,郭耀煌.基于非对称成本的设计竞赛博弈模型及奖金设置[J].运筹与管理,2005,14(2):84-90. 被引量:7
  • 2Bullinger AC,Neyer AK, Rass M,et al. Community-based in- novation contests : where competition meets cooperation [ J ]. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2010, 19 ( 3 ) : 290 - 303.
  • 3Che Y K, Gale I. Optimal design of research contests[ J ]. A- merican Economic Review ,2003,93 (3) :646 - 671.
  • 4Terwiesch C, Xu Y. Innovation contests, open innovation and multiagent problem solving [ J ]. Management Science, 2008, 54(9) :1529 - 1543.
  • 5Boudreau K J, Lacetera N,Lakhani K R. Incentives and prob-lem uncertainty in innovation contests:an empirical analysis [ J ]. Management Science ,2011,57 ( 5 ) : 843 - 863.
  • 6DiPalant:no D, Vojnovic M. Crowdsourcing arid all-pay auc- tions[ C]. Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Elec- tronic commerce. Stanford, CA ,2009,7:6 - 10.
  • 7Yang Y, Chen P, Pavlou P. Open innovation: an empiric',d study of online contests[ C]. Proceedings of thirteenth interna- tional conference on information systems. Pheenix:2009.
  • 8Moldovanu B ,Sela A. The optimal allocation of prizes in con- tests[ J]. The American Economic Review,2001,91 ( 3 ) : 542 -558.
  • 9Moldovanu B ,Sela A. Contests architecture[ J]. Journal of E- conomy Theory, 2006,126 ( 1 ) :70 - 96.
  • 10Matros A. Elimination tournaments where players have fixed resources[ Z ]. Working Paper, University of Pittsburgh,2005.

共引文献27

同被引文献22

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部