糖尿病患者动脉硬化指数对靶器官损害的预测价值分析被引量：2

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要选取68例糖尿病患者,按照AASI水平均分2组,0. 51以下者为低水平组,0. 51以上者作为高水平组,同时期选取68例健康人员作为参照组。对所有对象的AASI、ACR(尿白蛋白/尿肌酐)、IMT(颈动脉内-中膜厚度)作分析。结果:实验组AASI、ACR、IMT比参照组高(P <0. 05);与低水平组比,高水平组AASI、IMT高,(P <0. 05)。结论:利用糖尿病患者的AASI判定对靶器官损伤情况,具有较高的价值,操作方法简单。

作者赵秋莹李红运

机构地区焦作市第五人民医院内二科焦作市解放区中州社区卫生服务中心

出处《实用糖尿病杂志》 2018年第6期33-34,共2页 Journal of Practical Diabetology

关键词糖尿病动脉硬化指数(AASI) 靶器官损害

分类号 R587.2 [医药卫生—内分泌]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献5

1孔行锋.糖尿病患者动态动脉硬化指数对靶器官损害的预测价值[J].中国医学创新,2016,13(12):32-35. 被引量：2
2倪琦,许建忠,王长谦,蒋金全,楼丽娜.脉搏波速度与高血压及其靶器官损害的相关性研究[J].心血管康复医学杂志,2013,22(2):126-130. 被引量：3
3张志琴,杜国峰.高血压和糖尿病患者动态动脉硬化指数与靶器官损害的相关性[J].中国心血管病研究,2013,11(10):740-743. 被引量：6
4陈小贞,闫继锋,于运福.动态动脉硬化指数对糖尿病靶器官损害的预测价值[J].中国实用医刊,2015,42(5):65-66. 被引量：2
5陈云,袁如玉,李广平,闫哲慧.动态动脉硬化指数的相关因素及其对靶器官损害的研究[J].天津医药,2014,42(5):477-480. 被引量：17

二级参考文献53

1Munakata M, Nunokawa T, Yoshinaga K, et al. Brachial ankle pulse wave velocity is an independent risk factor for microalbu- minuria in patients with essential hypertension: a Japanese trial on the prognostic implication of pulse wave velocity (JTOPP) [J]. HypertensRes, 2006, 29 (7): 515-521.
2Blacher J, Safar ME. Large artery stiffness, hypertension and cardiovascular risk in order patients [J]. Nat Clin Pract Cardio- vascMed, 2005, 2 (9): 450-455.
3Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al. 2007 ESH ESC Practice Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hyperten- sion: ESH ESC task force on the Management of Arterial Hy- pertension [J]. J Hypertens, 2007, 25: 1751-1762.
4Yamashina A, Tomiyama H, Takeda K, et al. Validity, re- producibility, and clinical significance of noninvasive brachial-an- kle pulse wave velocity measurement [J]. Hypertens Res, 2002, 25 (3): 359-364.
5Kim [J, Park CG, Park JS, et al Relationship between blood pressure parameters and pulse wave velocity in normotensive and hypertensive subjects: invasive study [J]. J Hum Hypertens, 2007, 21 (2): 141-148.
6Hatsuda S, Shoji T,Shinohara K,et al. Regional arterial stiff-ness associated with ischemic heart disease in type 2 diabetes mel litus [J]. J Atheroscler Thromb,2006,13(2) :114-121.
7Kimoto E, Shoji T, Shinohara K, et al. Preferential stiffening of central over peripheral arteries in type 2 diabetes [J]. Diabe- tes, 2003, 52 (2): 448-452.
8Li Y, Wang JG,Staessen JA,et al. Ambulatory arterial stiffness index derived from 24-hour ambttlatory blood pressure monitor- ing. Hypertension, 2006,47 : 359-364.
9Palmas W, Picketing TG, Teresi J, et al. Ambulatory blood pres- sure monitoring and all-cause mortality in elderly people with diabetes mellitus. Hypertens, 2009,53: 120-127.
10Ben-Dov IZ, Gavish B, Kark JD, et al. A modified ambulatory ar- terial stiffness index is independently associated with all-cause mortality. Hypertens, 2008,22: 761-766.