摘要
马克思《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》第二条,学界存在诸多不同的解释方向,仅就依然还存有争议的解释而言,主要有四种不同的看法,即检验方法论、真理概念构成论、"大写的真理"论和回应怀疑论。前三种解释都未能准确理解马克思的论述所针对的问题,也不符合基本的语用逻辑,难以成为正解。马克思实际上是在回应怀疑论的看法。怀疑论者预设了观想的态度是真正的人的态度,并企图在此预设之下回答人的思维是否可能具有客观的真理性的问题。由于怀疑论者预设的前提是错误的,因而他们争论的只是一个无聊的伪问题。马克思认为只有实践的态度才合乎人的本质,一旦我们回到实践,怀疑论的怪想自然消失。
There are many different perspectives to interpret Thesis Ⅱ in Marx's "Theses on Feuerbach"in academia. Only with the interpretations that are still controvsial,we can find four different views.They are the theory of method of testing truth,the theory about constitution of the concept of truth,the theory of "Truth in Uppercase",and the theory of response to skepticism.The first three interpretations fail to accurately understand the issues addressed by Marx's discourse, and do not conform to the basic pragmatic logic ;therefore,they are not correct interpretations.Marx was in fact responding to skepticism.The skeptics presuppose that the contemplative attitude is the attitude of the real person,and they attempt to answer the question of whether people's thinking can have objective truth within this presupposition.All skeptics presuppose the false premise;consequently,what they argue about is nothing more than a silly pseudo -problem.Marx believed that only the practical attitude conforms to the essence of man.Once we return to practice,the quirks of skeptics will naturally vanish.
作者
文学平
WEN Xue-ping(Research Center for Ideological Strategy,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出处
《厦门大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第6期8-16,共9页
Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
基金
重庆市社科规划项目"马克思道德哲学的核心价值范畴研究"(2014YBZX011)
重庆市教委人文社科重点项目"习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想的理论渊源研究"(18SKGH002)
关键词
马克思
检验方法
真理概念
大写的真理
怀疑论
Marx
method of testing
concept of truth
"Truth in Uppercase"
skepticism
作者简介
文学平,男,重庆人,西南政法大学意识形态战略研究中心教授、博士生导师,哲学博士。
