摘要
为探讨科技期刊审稿中存在的关键问题及解决对策 ,抽取 2 0 0份中华妇产科杂志 2 0 0 0年审稿单及 60篇论著类文稿的 14 4份专家审稿意见 ,分别对审稿时间和审稿质量进行分析。除去初审退稿外 ,外审时间最短 7d ,最长 2 0 6d ,平均42 .7d ,一篇文稿从来稿到刊出平均最快要 7个月 ;60篇论著类文稿的专家审稿单 14 4份 ,共提出审稿意见 2 63条 ,最少 1条 ,最多 7条 ,平均 1.83条 (两审意见重叠时 ,按 1条计算 )。建议 :1)根据来稿总量调整初审退稿比率 ;2 )建立标准化审稿程序 ;3 )完善和扩大审稿队伍 ;4)建立专业副总编评审制度 ;5 )
The study is to investigate the problems within the manuscript review process for the Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and to propose possible solutions. Manuscripts processed in the year 2000 for the journal were used in this study. Two hundred peer review forms were randomly selected to analyze the review time, and an additional 144 peer review forms for 60 original research manuscripts were randomly selected to analyze the review quality. Manuscripts sent for peer review required an average review time of 42.7 d, with a range of 7-206 d. On the average the time from the reception of a manuscript to its publication was 7 months. Of the 60 original research manuscripts sent for peer reciew, there was a total of 263 revision recommendations given by 144 peer reviewers, an average of 1.83 recommendations per reviewer, with a range of 1-7 recommendations (same recommendations given by different reviewers were counted once). The following measures are suggested for improving the manuscript review process for the Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology: 1)Use the total number of manuscripts received as an indication to determine the pre peer review rejection rate. 2)Establish a standardized peer review process. 3)Increase the number of peer reviewers. 4)Establish a system of reviewing manuscripts with the associate editors. 5)Increase the skills of the editors in the editorial office.
出处
《编辑学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2002年第1期29-31,共3页
Acta Editologica
