摘要
目的 进一步确立诊断肾盂积水的可靠方法。方法 分两组采用三种检查方法进行比较 ,A组对 1 2 0例B超诊断为肾盂积水的患者同时采用常规静脉肾盂造影 (IVP)和CT进行对照检查。B组对 840例肾绞痛的患者用常规IVP和B超进行检查。结果 A组 1 2 0例B超诊断为肾盂积水的患者中 ,CT诊断肾盂积水 1 0 2例 ,常规IVP诊断肾盂积水 99例 ;B组中常规IVP诊断肾盂积水 2 0 7例 ,而B超诊断肾盂积水 2 43例。结论 对肾盂积水的检查 ,B超最为简便、患者痛苦少 ,但时有假阳性发生 ;常规IVP对肾盂积水的诊断准确可靠 ,一般无须进行CT检查。
Objective To further explore a credible method of diagnosing hydrocalyces. Methods Two groups of cases with 3 methods were studied. One handred and twenty cases with hydrocalyces indicated by B-ultrasound were examined by routine intravenous pyelography (IVP) and CT scan, 840 cases with renal colic underwent routine IVP and B-ultrosound examination. Results Hydrocalyces were diagnosed in 102 of 120 cases by CT, 99 cases proved by routine IVP. Hydrocalyces were diagnosed in 207 of 840 cases by routine IVP and 243 cases by B-ultrasound. Conclusion To form a diagnosis on hydrocalyces, B-ultrasound is more simple than other examinations, routine IVP is accurate and CT is not essential. B-ultrasound is harmfulless to patients, but has some falsepositive.
出处
《临床军医杂志》
CAS
2001年第3期57-58,共2页
Clinical Journal of Medical Officers
关键词
肾盂积水
静脉肾盂造影
CT检查
B超检查
hydrocalyces
intravenous pyelography (IVP)
computed tomography (CT) B-ultrasound
