摘要
我国《民事诉讼法》和《仲裁法》在规定法院对违反仲裁程序、仲裁员的不正当行为及违反社会公共利益的仲裁实施监督的同时 ,还确认了法院有权对仲裁认定的事实及其证据、法律的适用等实体内容进行全方位的司法审查。这样的规定既对当事人逃避仲裁裁决的效力制造了一个法律借口 ,也为对仲裁的不当的司法干预提供了制度上的漏洞。因此 ,修改现行法律 ,将司法对仲裁的监督由实体审查改为程序审查 ,既符合国际惯例 ,也有助于促进我国仲裁事业的发展。
The two books, Law of the Civil Procedure and Arbitration Law, published in our country stipulate that the people's court may supervise and review the arbitration award which violates the arbitration procedure, concerns with unfair behavior by arbitrators and infringes the social public interests. That apart, the two books also state that the people's courts have the right to review the facts and evidences confirmed in the arbitration and its legal enforcement. These provisions not only give a pretext to the parties who want to escape the arbitration award, but also provide the court a chance to interfere incorrectly in the arbitration. Hence, the above mentioned judicial review of arbitration award must be revised from the fact review to the procedure review. Such a change will not only accord with international practices, but also promote the development of arbitration in our country.
出处
《贵州大学学报（社会科学版）》
2001年第4期30-35,共6页
Journal of Guizhou University(Social Sciences)
