期刊文献+

枯草芽孢杆菌OKB105产生的surfactin防治烟草花叶病毒病及其机理研究 被引量:17

Effect and Mechanism of Controlling TMV Disease on Tobacco by Surfactin Produced by Bacillus subtilis OKB105
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文研究枯草芽孢杆菌产生的脂肽化合物表面活性素surfactin对烟草花叶病毒病的防治效果,并检测烟草防卫相关基因的表达情况以解析抗病机理。利用6 mol/L HCl沉淀枯草芽孢杆菌OKB105的去细胞培养液,通过甲醇抽提,Sephadex LH20层析柱获得脂肽纯化物。经MALDI-TOF-MS和血平板溶血试验检测表明,纯化物中仅含有表面活性素surfactin。将表面活性素配成0.01 g/L溶液,处理烟草并接种TMV。结果表明,surfactin对烟草花叶病毒病有显著的防治效果,病斑抑制率为70.9%。通过Real-time PCR检测烟草的防卫相关基因的表达情况结果发现,烟草SA信号通路的PR1、PR3和PR5,以及ET通路的ETR1表达量显著提高,说明surfactin诱导了烟草依赖于SA和ET信号通路的诱导系统抗性(induced systemic resistance,ISR)反应。 In order to interpret resistance mechanism, controlling effect of surfactin against TMV on tobacco and the expression pattern of defense-related genes were investigated. Liquid culture of Bacillus subtilis OKB105 was precipitated by 6 mol/L HCl. The crude extract of lipopeptides was dissolved by methanol and separated by LH20 chromatographic column. The crude extract detected surfactin only by MALDI-TOF-MS and hemolytic activity analysis. Tobacco was infected with TMV after pretreated by 0.01 g/L surfactin, the result showed that surfactin could control TMV efficiently, the controlling effect reached to 70.9%. The expressions of SA-pathway genes PR1, PR3, PR5, and ET-pathway gene ETR1 were obviously increased by real-time PCR test. The results demonstrated that surfactin could elicite ISR (induced systemic resistance) reaction which depend on SA-pathway and ET-pathway.
出处 《中国生物防治学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期216-221,共6页 Chinese Journal of Biological Control
基金 国家自然科学基金(31100056) 高等学校博士学科点(20100097120011) 公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201303015) 国家"863"计划(2012AA101504)
关键词 SURFACTIN 烟草花叶病毒病 防治效果 诱导系统抗性 surfactin TMV disease control efficiency ISR
作者简介 任鹏举(1985-),男,硕士研究生,E-mail:2010102019@njau.edu.cn;高学文*通讯作者,教授,E-mail:gaoxw@njau.edu.cn;
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献25

  • 1汪金莲,邱业先,陈宏伟,罗友强.油菜菌核病诱抗菌桃褐腐病菌培养基的筛选及小规模生产[J].江苏农业科学,2007,35(2):69-71. 被引量:2
  • 2JL Vanneste. Fire Blight and Its Causative Agent, Erwinia amylovora. Wallingford: CAB International, 2000. 141
  • 3Wei Z, Beer S V. Acta Hort, 1996, 411: 223
  • 4Wei Z, Lacy R J, Zumoff C H, et al. Science, 1992,257: 85
  • 5Strobel R N, Gopalan J S, Kuc J A, et al. Plant J, 1996, 9: 431
  • 6Wei Z M, Qiu D, Kropp M J, et al. Phytopathology, 1998, 88: S96
  • 7Zitter T A, Beer S V. Phytopathology, 1998, 88: 104
  • 8Dong H, Delaney T P, Bauer D W, et al. Plant J, 1999, 20: 207
  • 9Wang K L, Li H, Ecker J R. Plant Cell, 2002, 14: 131
  • 10Cao H, Li X, Dong X. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1998, 95: 6531

共引文献37

同被引文献289

引证文献17

二级引证文献182

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部