期刊文献+

利用CBCT分析上颌前牙区微种植体支抗植入的安全范围 被引量:3

Quantitative study of maxillary anterior bone depth for micro-implant anchorage placement using cone beam CT
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :利用锥形束CT(cone beam computed tomography,CBCT)对上颌前牙区各根间的近远中及唇腭侧骨质厚度进行测量分析,为确定正畸治疗植入微种植支抗的安全范围提供参考。方法:对30例成人患者上颌前牙区行CBCT扫描及三维重建,测量距上颌牙槽嵴顶4、6、8、10、12 mm水平上颌中切牙、侧切牙、尖牙根间区近远中向、唇腭向的距离。结果:上中切牙牙根间至牙槽嵴顶4、6、8、10 mm近远中间距均最宽,在距牙槽嵴顶8 mm水平,中切牙与侧切牙牙根间近远中向距离最窄;中切牙牙根间骨厚度在唇腭向距牙槽嵴顶8 mm及以上水平最薄,中切牙与侧切牙牙根间骨厚度最厚。30例中有6例前牙区各牙根长度均>12 mm,其根间近远中向距离距牙槽嵴顶12 mm水平均较宽。结论:通过对扫描后颌骨影像的分析,明确了前牙区各牙根间骨量,为确定植入微种植支抗的安全范围提供参考。 Objective:To investigate the bone depth of maxillary anterior interdental area for orthodontic micro-implant an-chorage. Methods:Maxillary anterior alveolar bone of 30 adults was scanned and reconstructed by cone beam CT , the mesio-distal interdental distance and labial-palatal bone depth were measured at 4,6,8,10 and 12 mm from the alveolar crest be-tween upper anterior dental roots. Results: The mesio-distal distance between central incisors was the widest in all measure-ment levels, while the labial cortical bone thickness was the thinnest. At the 8 mm-level,the shortest mesio-distal distance was between the roots of central and lateral incisors. At or above the 8 mm-level , the labial-palatal bone depth was the thinnest between central incisors, but the thickest between central and lateral incisors. It was seen in only 6 cases that the root length exceeded 12 mm. Conclusion:This study provides suitable bone thickness and bone depth for micro-screws place-ment of maxillary anterior region.
出处 《南通大学学报(医学版)》 2013年第6期500-502,共3页 Journal of Nantong University(Medical sciences)
关键词 上颌前牙区 微种植支抗 根间骨质厚度 锥形束CT cone-beam computed tomography maxillary anterior interdental area micro-implant anchorage bone depth between upper anterior dental roots
作者简介 夏文倩,女,汉族,生于1985年2月,江苏省南通市人,硕士,研究方向:口腔正畸学。f通信作者1高美琴,电话:18006299933,E-mail:ntgmq@126.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Kanomi R. Mini-im plant for orthodontic anchorage[J].Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics,1997,(11):763-767.
  • 2Park HS,Bae SM,Kyung HM. Micro-implant An-chorage for treatment of skeletal class I bialveolar protru-sion[J].Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics,2001,(07):417-422.
  • 3Kuroda S,Sugawara Y,Deguchi T. Clinical use of miniscrew implants as orthodontic anchorage:success rates and postoperative discomfort[J].American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics,2007,(01):9-15.doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.032.
  • 4Arnheiter C,Scarfe WC,Farman AG. Trends in maxillofa-cial cone-beam computed tomography usage[J].Oral Radi-ology,2006,(02):80-85.
  • 5Ludlow JB,Laster WS,See M. Accuracy of measure-ments of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed to-mography images[J].Oral Surgery,Oral Medicine,Oral Pathology,Oral Radiology & Endodontics,2007,(04):534-542.
  • 6Deguchi T,Murakami T,Kuroda S. Comparison of the intrusion effects on the maxillary incisors between implant anchorage and J-hook headgear[J].Am J Orthod Dentofa-cial Orthop,2008,(05):654-660.
  • 7陆史俊,王林,王震东.前牙压低技术在深覆患者矫治中的应用进展[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2011,38(6):674-676. 被引量:10
  • 8Saxena R,Kumar PS,Upadhyay M. A clinical evalu-ation of orthodontic mini-implants as intraoral anchorage for the intrusion of maxillary anterior teeth[J].World J Or-thod,2010,(04):346-351.
  • 9Martins DR,Tibola D,Janson G. Effects of intrusion combined with anterior retraction on apical root resorption[J].European Journal of Orthodontics,2012,(02):170-175.
  • 10Sung JH,Kyung HM,Bae SM. Microimolants in or-thodontics[M].Deagu,Korea:Dentos Inc,2006.21-21.

二级参考文献21

  • 1Shroff B, Yoon WM, Lindauer SJ, et al. Simultaneous intrusion and retraction using a three-piece base arch [iT. Angle Orthod, 1997, 67(6):455-462.
  • 2Ng J, Major PW, Heo G, et al. True incisor intrusion attained during orthodontic treatment: A systematic re- view and meta-analysis[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Or- thop, 2005, 128 (2) : 212-219.
  • 3van Steenbergen E, Burstone CJ, Prahl-Andersen B, et al. The role of a high pull headgear in counteracting side effects from intrusion of the maxillary anterior seg- ment[J]. Angle Orthod, 2004, 74(4):480-486.
  • 4Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Makou M, et al. Forces and mo- ments generated with various incisor intrusion systems on maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth[J]. Angle Or- thod, 2009, 79 (5) : 928-933.
  • 5Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Makou M, et al. Forces and mo- ments on posterior teeth generated by incisor intrusion biomechanics[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2009, 12 (4) : 305-311.
  • 6Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Makou M, et al. A comparative assessment of the forces and moments generated with various maxiUary incisor intrusion biomechanics[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2010, 32(2) : 159-164.
  • 7Davidoviteh M, Rebellato J. Two-couple orthodontic ap- pliance systems utility arches: A two-couple intrusion arch[J]. Semin Orthod, 1995, 1 (1) : 25-30.
  • 8Hammond AB 3rd. Treatment of a Class II malocclusion with deep overbite[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial (Mhop, 2002, 121 (5) : 531-537.
  • 9Ohnishi H, Yagi T, Yasuda Y, et al. A mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage in a deep overbite case [J]. Angle Orthod, 2005, 75 (3) : 444-452.
  • 10Polat-Ozsoy O, Arman-Ozcirpici A, Veziroglu F. Minis- crews for upper incisor intrusion[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2009, 31 (4) :412-416.

共引文献9

同被引文献41

  • 1Katona TR. Flaws in root resorption assessment algorithms:role of tooth shape [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006, 130 (6) :698.
  • 2Flores-Mir C, Rosenblatt MR, Major PW,et al. Measurement accu- racyand reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT recon- structed panoramic radiographs[ J ]. Dental Press J Orthod, 2014, 19(5) :45-53.
  • 3Tarazona B, Llamas JM, Cibri~ R, et al. Evaluation of thevalidity of the Bohon Index using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) [ J ]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2012, 17 (5) : e878-883.
  • 4Alam MK,Shahid F,Purmal K,et al. Bolton tooth size ratio and'its relation with arch widths, arch length and arch perimeter: a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) study [ J ]. Acta Odontol Scand,2014,72(8) :1047-1053.
  • 5Machado GL. CBCT imaging-A boon to orthodontics [ J ]. Saudi Dent J ,2015,27 ( 1 ) : 12-21.
  • 6Fourie Z, Damstra J, Gerrits PO, et al. Accuracy and reliability of facialsoft tissue depth measurements using cone beam computer tomography[ J ]. Forensic Sci Int ,2010,199( 1/3 ) :9-14.
  • 7de Oliveira AE, Cevidanes LH, Phillips C,et al. Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identificationon cone- beam computerized tomography [ J ]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod ,2009,107 (2) :256-265.
  • 8Ludlow JB, Gubler M, Cevidanes L, et al. Precision of cephalomet- ric landmarkidentification: cone-beam computed tomograpliy vs conventional cephalometricviews [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2009,136(3) :312.
  • 9Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, et al. Accuracy of lineartem- poromandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography anddigital cephalometric radiography[ J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2005,128 ( 6 ) : 803-811.
  • 10Schlueter B, Kim KB, Oliver D, et al. Cone beam computed tomo- graphy 3D reconstruction of the mandibular condyle [ J ]. Angle Orthod ,2008,78 (5) : 880-888.

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部