期刊文献+

Millikan术式与传统修补治疗腹股沟疝的对比研究 被引量:4

Comparison of Millikan technology and traditional repair in treatment of inguinal hernia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的采用Millikan技术修补腹股沟疝的意义及疗效。方法回顾性分析1998年9月至2008年7月重庆市南岸区中西医结合医院收治的腹股沟疝患者110例。随机分为二组,试验组采用Millikan技术修补,对照组采用传统方法修补。分析二种手术方法的治疗效果、复发率等情况。结果二组患者手术均获得成功。术后并发症统计,对照组多于试验组。术后随访5年,对照组复发率14.81%(8/54),试验组复发率1.78%(1/56),二组差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.21,P=0.02)。结论传统的修补方法存在固定缺陷。Millikan技术修补对减少术后并发症及降低术后复发率有重大意义。 Objective To assess the significance and effect of Millikan technology in repair of inguinal hernia. Methods A total of 100 patients with inguinal hernia were treated in the Chongqing Nan'an Hospital for Traditional and Western Medicine from September 1998 to July 2008 and retrospectively analyzed. The patients were randomized into two groups. The Millikan technology was applied in the test group and the patients were treated with traditional medicine in the control group. The operation methods, the effect, and recurrence rate were analyzed in the two groups. Results The operation was successful. The percentages of postoperative complications were higher in the control group compared to the test group. The recurrence rate in the control group was 14.81% (8/54) after a 5-year follow-up. The recurrence rate of the test group was 1.78% (1/56). The difference in postoperative recurrence rate was statistically significant between the two groups (X2 = 6. 21, P = 0. 02 ). Conclusions The traditional repair method had unavoidable weakness. Millikan repair owns significance in clinical practice to reduce postoperative complications and lower recurrence rate.
作者 吴礼果 谭科
出处 《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》 2014年第1期34-36,共3页 Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition)
关键词 腹股沟 疝修补术 手术后并发症 复发 Hernia, inguinal Herniorrhaphy Postoperative complications Recurrence
作者简介 通讯作者:吴礼果,Email:wlg161616@sohu.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献48

共引文献877

同被引文献27

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部