期刊文献+

五种烤瓷合金金瓷结合强度的比较 被引量:4

Metal-ceramic bonding strength comparison among five porcelain fuse metal
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较镍铬合金、含钛的镍铬合金、钴铬合金、钯银合金和纯钛的金瓷结合强度。方法:执行ISO9693标准,采用三点弯曲试验分别测定镍铬合金、含钛的镍铬合金、钴铬合金、钯银合金、纯钛在常规热处理条件下的金瓷结合强度。结果:金瓷结合强度分别为:镍铬合金(37.82±2.72)Mpa;含钛的镍铬合金(39.23±2.45)Mpa;钴铬合金(39.06±3.41)Mpa;钯银合金(47.98±3.74)Mpa;纯钛(32.61±5.62)Mpa。镍铬合金、含钛的镍铬合金、钴铬合金组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),这3种合金与纯钛、钯银合金组间差异都有统计学意义(P<0.05),纯钛与钯银合金组间差异也有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:①镍铬合金、含钛的镍铬合金、钴铬合金金瓷结合强度相近,都大于纯钛且小于钯银合金的金瓷结合强度。②镍铬合金、含钛的镍铬合金、钴铬合金、钯银合金和纯钛的金瓷结合强度都大于25 Mpa,按ISO9693标准均可应用于临床。 Objective: To investigate and compare the metal-ceramic bonding strength of Ni-Cr alloy, Ni-Cr-Ti alloy, Co-Cr alloy, Pd-Ag alloy and pure Titanium. Method: Fifty wax patterns having dimensions 25 mm X 3.0 mm X 0.5 mm were prepared by a metal mold. Metal-ceramic specimens were fabricated with five types of metal-ceramic alloys,10 for each type of alloy. All samples were prepared by the clinical empirical heat treatment. Ceramco 111 porcelain cement was fused and adhered to Ni-Cr alloy, Ni-Cr-Ti alloy, Co-Cr alloy and Pd-Ag alloy while Willi Geller porcelain cement to pure Titanium.The metal-ceramic bonding strengths were evaluated using a three-point bending test according to IS09693. The bonding strength data was analyzed using ANOVA and Bonferroni's test by SPSS16.0. Result: The mean value of bonding strength of five alloys were (37.82+2.72)Mpa(Ni-Cr alloy),(39.23+2.45)Mpa(Ni-Cr-Ti alloy),(39.06+3.41)Mpa(Co-Cr alloy), (47.98-+3.74) Mpa(Pd-Ag alloy)and (32.61-+5.62)Mpa(pure Titanium).Ni-Cr alloy, Ni-Cr-Ti alloy and Co-Cr alloy groups (P 〉0.05), the first three groups have significant difference with both pure Titanium group and Pd-Ag alloy group (P 〈0.05),and Pd-Ag alloy group have significant difference with pure Titanium group too (P 〈0.05). Conclusion: According to the test result, the metal-ceramic bonding strengths of Ni-Cr alloy, Ni-Cr-Ti alloy and Co-Cr alloy are closed,which are greater than that of pure Titanium and lower than that of Pd-Ag alloy. The bonding strengths of all metal-porcelain systems are within the acceptable levels by ISO9693 standard (〉25 Mpa).
出处 《临床口腔医学杂志》 2014年第1期15-18,共4页 Journal of Clinical Stomatology
基金 广东省科技计划项目(2006B36006016)
关键词 烤瓷熔附金属修复体 金瓷结合强度 三点弯曲测试 PFM metal-ceramic bonding strength three-point bend test
作者简介 通讯作者:叶剑涛:Tel:020—81332579E—mail:dutaoye@163.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1谢芸,王敏,楼北雁.烤瓷合金材料生物相容性的研究与进展[J].中国组织工程研究,2012,16(29):5450-5454. 被引量:3
  • 2O'Connor RP,Mackert JR Jr,M yers M L. Castability,opaque masking,and porcelain bonding of 17 porcelain-fused-to-metal alloys[J].{H}Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry,1996,(4):367-374.
  • 3丁伟山,王铎,兰晶,杜朝霞,刘文侠.不同烤瓷合金及预氧化处理对金瓷结合强度影响的研究[J].上海口腔医学,2004,13(3):186-188. 被引量:6
  • 4Rake PC,Goodacre CJ,Moore BK. Effect of two opaquing techniques and two metal surface conditions on metal-ceramic bond strength[J].{H}Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry,1995,(1):8-17.
  • 5伊哲,郝玉全,吴琳,伊萍.钯银合金与钴铬合金的机械性能及金瓷结合强度比较研究[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2012,5(6):354-357. 被引量:8
  • 6Liu R,Johnston WM,Holloway JA. The effect of metal recasting on porcelain-metal bonding:a force-to-failure study[J].{H}Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry,2010,(3):165-172.
  • 7Schweitzer DM,Goldstein GR,Ricci JL. Comparison of bond strength of a pressed ceramic fused to metal versus feldspathic porcelain fused to metal[J].{H}Journal of Prosthodontics,2005,(4):239-247.
  • 8Turan Korkmaz,Volkan Asar. Comparative evaluation of bond strength of various metal-ceramic restorations[J].{H}Materials and Design,2009,(3):445-451.doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2008.06.002.
  • 9吴芝凯,李宁.牙科Co-Cr烤瓷合金的金瓷结合性研究[J].特种铸造及有色合金,2011,31(2):164-166. 被引量:11
  • 10Lombardo GH,Nishioka RS. Influence of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of ceramics fused to cobalt-chromium[J].Prosthodont,2010,(2):103-111.

二级参考文献95

共引文献43

同被引文献30

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部