摘要
在对经济学界关于经济学学派划分标准进行阐述的基础上,归纳分析了国内外学者关于发展经济学流派的划分观点。学者们普遍接受将发展经济学划分为结构主义经济发展思路、新古典主义经济发展思路、新古典政治经济学思路和激进主义经济发展思路。本文对上述四种思路的研究方法进行了分析,并明确指出上述几种思路研究方法分歧的本质,即"单一经济学"和"双元经济学"之争、发展中国家经济发展的"内因"与"外因"之争、对经济发展进行"纯经济研究"还是进行"社会经济系统研究"之争。
This paper explains the economic circles division standards about school of economics, and on this basis,introduces the domestic and foreign scholars＂ points about the division of development economics schools. Scholars generally accept the following development ideas, that is, development economics is divided into structural- ism, neoclassical economics, new classical political economics and activist economic development. The paper analy- zes the idea of the four research methods in detail. Last the article explicitly points out the nature of the differences above several research methods, those are the debate about ＂a single economics＂ and ＂the dual economic＂, the controversy about ＂internal cause＂ and ＂external cause＂ of economic development in developing countries ,and contention on economic development ＂pure economic research＂ or ＂social economic system research＂.
出处
《内蒙古财经大学学报》
2013年第6期1-5,共5页
Journal of Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics
关键词
发展经济学
学派划分
研究方法
development economics
division standards about school of economics
research methods
作者简介
张建斌（1978-）,男,内蒙古乌兰察布人,内蒙古财经大学经济学院副教授,博士,从事公共政策与政府规制研究.
