期刊文献+

两种术式下髓核摘除对椎旁肌肉损伤及近期疗效的比较 被引量:5

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较传统开放手术与椎间盘镜下治疗腰椎间盘突出症对椎旁肌肉损伤程度及近期临床效果。方法回顾2008年3月至2009年10月我院收治的腰椎间盘突出症37例患者随机分成为22例微创组(MED)及15例开放组,测量两组患者术前、术后24h,术后48h外周血中CK浓度,测量手术时间、术中出血量,记录术后住院天数及切口长度,比较术前及术后1个月、3个月的vAs及ODI评分。结果微创组及开放组比较,外周血CK浓度升高幅度小,恢复快,术中出血少,皮肤切口小,术前及术后VAS、ODI无明显统计学差异。两组患者均随访4~13个月,平均(7±0.8)个月,均未再发腰腿痛症状。结论后路椎间盘镜在椎间盘突出症的治疗能够达到开放手术的目的,具有对于椎旁肌肉组织损伤小、手术创伤轻,出血少,恢复快的特点,是治疗椎间盘突出的较好的方法。
出处 《中华临床医师杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2013年第19期127-129,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition)
基金 广东省自然科学基金(S2012010008531) 深圳市南山区重点科研项目(2011001)
作者简介 通讯作者:易伟宏,Email:szyiwh@163.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1易伟宏,黄曹,陈开林,胡广询,王锡三,王敏,王尔天,刘赫,罗万荣,何聪.内窥镜下手术治疗腰椎间盘退变性疾病的并发症[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2009,19(12):916-920. 被引量:9
  • 2Jensen MP,Karoly P,Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intersity:a comparision of six methods Pain[J].1986.117-126.
  • 3Fairbank JC,Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index[J].SPINE,2000.2940-2952.
  • 4Fritz JM,Irrgang JJ. A comparison of a modified Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire and the quebec back pain disability Scale[J].Physical Therapy,2001.776-788.
  • 5Lee KH,Yue WM,Yeo W. Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion[J].European Spine Journal,2012.2265-2270.
  • 6Louthrenoo W,Weerayutwattana N,Lertp rasertsuke N. Serummuscle enzymes,muscle pathology and clinicalmuscle weakness:correlation in Thai patient swith polymyositis dermatomyositis[J].J Med Assc Thai,2002.26-32.
  • 7Kawaguchi Y,Matsui H,Tsuji H. Changes in serum creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme after lumbar spine surgery[J].SPINE,1997.1018-1023.
  • 8闫国良,纪振钢,高浩然,李存孝,史锦华,李红,刘海潮,钱济先.微创经椎间孔减压腰椎融合内固定术与传统后路开放手术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的疗效比较[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2013,23(3):244-250. 被引量:57
  • 9Shin DA,Kim KN,Shin HC. The efficacy of microendoscopic Discectomy in reducing iatrogenic muscle injury[J].Journal of Neurosurgery-Spine,2008.39-43.
  • 10Arts MP,Nieborg A,Brand R. Serum creatine phosphokinase as an indicator of muscle injury after various spinal and nonspinal surgical procedures[J].Journal of Neurosurgery-Spine,2007.282-286.

二级参考文献30

  • 1侯树勋,李明全,白巍,商卫林,吴闻文,王韬,史亚民,罗卓荆.腰椎髓核摘除术远期疗效评价[J].中华骨科杂志,2003,23(9):513-516. 被引量:214
  • 2鲍磊,海涌,马华松,周雪峰,邹德威,周立宇.脊柱内窥镜下腰椎间盘摘除术远期疗效评价[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(3):184-186. 被引量:6
  • 3周跃,张超.内窥镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的现状及存在的问题[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(4):248-249. 被引量:21
  • 4Nowitzke AM.Assessment of the learning curve for lumbar microendoscopic discectomy [J].Neurosurgery,2005,56 (4) : 755 - 762.
  • 5Inamasu J, Guiot BH. Vascular injury and complication in neurosurgical spine surgery. [J].Acta Neurochir (Wien),2006, 148(4) :375-387.
  • 6Mathews HH,Long BH. Minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of intervertebral disk herniation[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Sung, 2002,10 ( 2 ) : 80-85.
  • 7Brayda-Bruno M,Cinnella P. Posterior endoscopic discectomy (and other procedures ) [J]. Eur Spine J,2002,(9 Suppl 1):24- 29.
  • 8Lee KH, Yue WM, Yeo W, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion[J]. Eur Spine J, 2012, 21(11): 2265- 2270.
  • 9Foley KT, Holly LT, Sehwender JD. Minimally invasive lum- bar fusion[J]. Spine, 2003, 28(15 Suppl): 26-35.
  • 10Villavieeneio AT, Burneikiene S, Roeea CM, et al. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion[J]. Surg Neurol Int, 2010, 1: 12.

共引文献84

同被引文献42

引证文献5

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部