期刊文献+

生命意义感量表中文修订版在中学生群体中的信效度 被引量:136

Psychometric Evaluation of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire in Chinese Middle School Students
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评估生命意义感量表(MLQ)中文修订版在中国中学生群体中的信效度。方法:采用方便取样的方法,抽取1899名中学生完成MLQ、总体生活满意度量(SWLS)、修订后的积极情感消极情感量表(PANAS)、流调用抑郁自评量表(CES-D)、状态焦虑问卷(S-AI)。结果:①MLQ中文修订版共10个题项,探索性因素分析提取了拥有意义感(MLQ-P)和寻求意义感(MLQ-S)2个因子,因子贡献率分别为31.154%和30.406%;验证性因素分析也验证了原量表2因子结构的有效性。②MLQ-P、MLQ-S与主观幸福感(SWB)显著正相关(r=0.384,r=0.138,P<0.001),与S-AI显著负相关(r=-0.396,r=-0.107,P<0.001),与CES-D相关分别为-0.344(P<0.001)、-0.021(P>0.05)。③总量表及MLQ-P、MLQ-S的内部一致性α系数分别为0.830、0.842、0.828,间隔7个星期后的重测信度分别为0.639、0.746和0.558。结论:MLQ中文修订版在中学生群体中具有良好的信效度。 Objective: To develop the Meaning in Life Questionnaire-Chinese version (MLQ-C) and to examine its psy- chometric properties in a sample of Chinese middle school students. Methods: Totally 1899 middle school students from three provinces of China completed MLQ-C, Satisfaction With Life Scale(SWLS), Revision of the Positive Affect and Neg- ative Affect Scale (PANAS), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and S-AI of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Part of the data randomly selected (n=925) was conducted Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and the other part (n=974) was used in Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA). Results: Firstly, EFA extracted two factors[(Presence of meaning (MLQ-P) and Search for meaning (MLQ-S)] from lO-item of MLQ-C, and supported the original MLQ 2-factor model. MLQ-P and MLQ-S's factor contribution rate were 31.154% and 30.406% respectively. CFA on other samples also con- firmed the original MLQ 2-factor structural model (X2= 242.298, P〈0.001, NFI=0.938, RFI=0.918, IFI=0.946, TLI=0.929, CFI=0.946, PNFI=0.709, PCFI=0.715, RMSEA=0.079). Secondly, MLQ-P and MLQ-S scores were positively correlated with SWB (r=-0.384, r=-0.138, P〈0.001), while negatively correlated with S-AI(r=--0.396, i=--0.107, P〈0.001 ) and CES-D (r=-0.344, P〈0.001; r=-0.021, P〉0.05). Thirdly, internal consistency Cronbach's α coefficients of the total MLQ-C, MLQ-P and MLQ-S were 0.830, 0.842 and 0.828, and 7 weeks later the test-retest reliability(n=ll6) of the total MLQ-C, MLQ-P and MLQ-S were 0.639, 0.746 and 0.558. Conclusion: The MLQ-C has acceptable psychometric quality amongst Chinese middle school students.
作者 王鑫强
机构地区 重庆社会科学院
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期764-767,763,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 全国教育科学规划2012年度教育部青年项目(E-BA120332) 项目主持人:陈良
关键词 生命意义感量表中文修订版 信度 效度 中学生 心理健康 The meaning in life questionnaire-Chinese version Reliability Validity Chinese middle school stu-dents Mental health
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Frankl VE. Man's search for meaning:An introduction to logotherapy. New York: Washington Square Press, 1963.
  • 2FranklVE,著.赵可式,沈锦惠,译.活出意义来.第1版.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店.1991.81-99.
  • 3Steger MF. Meaning in life. In Snyder CR, Lopez SJ. Oxford handbook of positive psychology. New York: Oxford Univer- sity Press, 2009. 679-687.
  • 4程明明,樊富珉.生命意义心理学理论取向与测量[J].心理发展与教育,2010,26(4):431-437. 被引量:92
  • 5Brassai L, Piko BF, Steger MF. Meaning in life: Is it a pro- tective factor for adolescents' psychological health? Intera- ational Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2011, 18(1): 44-51.
  • 6Fahlman SA, Mercer KB, Gaskovski P, et al. Does a lack of life meaning cause boredom? Results from psychometric, longitudinal, and experimental analyses. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2009, 28(3): 307-340.
  • 7王鑫强,张大均,薛中华,齐晓栋.免费师范生职业认同感与生命意义的关系[J].心理学探新,2012,32(3):277-281. 被引量:32
  • 8彭霞,王鑫强,郭成.重庆某高校大学生生命意义感与心理健康关系[J].中国学校卫生,2011,32(9):1119-1120. 被引量:40
  • 9Steger MF, Frazier P, Oishi S, et al. The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2006, 53 (1): 80-93.
  • 10张姝玥,许燕,杨浩铿.生命意义的内涵、测量及功能[J].心理科学进展,2010,18(11):1756-1761. 被引量:128

二级参考文献186

共引文献1848

同被引文献1452

引证文献136

二级引证文献870

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部