期刊文献+

PL-11血小板功能分析仪检测ADP诱导的血小板聚集率参考区间初步调查 被引量:8

Preliminary investigation of reference interval defined by PL-11 platelet function analyzer for assessment of ADP-induced platelet aggregation rate
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价PL-11血小板功能分析仪(电阻抗法)检测二磷酸腺苷(ADP)诱导的血小板聚集率的性能并初步调查其参考区间。方法参照临床和实验室标准化协会(CLSI)相关文件,评价PL-11血小板功能分析仪检测PLT的精密度、正确度、携带污染率及线性范围,与比浊法检测100例心内科患者ADP诱导的血小板聚集率结果进行对比。用PL-11血小板功能分析仪检测544例体检健康者ADP诱导的血小板聚集率水平,初步建立健康成人ADP诱导的血小板聚率的参考区间。结果PL-11血小板功能分析仪检测PLT的变异系数(CV)<4.0%,偏移<4.0%,在(40~800)×109/L范围内线性良好(R2=0.995 3),携带污染率<1.5%,符合CLSI相关文件要求;电阻抗法和比浊法检测ADP诱导的血小板聚集率结果分别为(67.58±15.14)%、(41.28±15.45)%,相关系数(r)=0.62(P<0.05)。健康成人ADP诱导的血小板聚集率(电阻抗法)的参考区间为49.66%~86.62%。结论 PL-11血小板功能分析仪检测ADP诱导的血小板聚集率性能良好,初步建立了其参考区间。 Objective To evaluate the performance of PL-11 platelet function analyzer based on electrical impedance technology and establish a preliminary reference interval for adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation rate. Methods According to the document of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), the precision, accuracy, carry-over rate and linearity of the PL-11 platelet function analyzer were evaluated. The test results of 100 patients with cardiovascular diseases were compared with those tested by light transmission aggregometry (LTA). The preliminary reference interval of ADP-induced platelet aggregation rate of PL-11 plate-let function analyzer was defined by testing 544 samples from healthy volunteers. Results The total coefficient of variation values (CV) of precision at different levels was less than 4% and the bias of all levels was less than 4%. The assay displayed a fine linearity for platelet test (R^2 = 0.995 3) over the studied range (40-800) × 10^9/L, and the carry-over rate was less than 1.5%. The ADP-in-duced platelet aggregation rates tested by PL-11 platelet function analyzer with electrical impedance and LTA with turbidimetry method were (67.58±15.14)% and (41.28 ±15.45 )% respectively, and the correlation coefficient between the two methods was 0.62 (P 〈 0.05 ). The biological reference interval of ADP-induced platelet aggregation rate in healthy subjects was from 49.66% to 86.62%. Conclusions PL-11 platelet function analyzer has been verified to be a reliable assay with convenient performance characteristics, en-abling for routine testing in clinical laboratory. The biological reference interval of PL-11 platelet function analyzer for ADP-induced platelet aggregation rate was preliminary defined.
出处 《临床检验杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第9期715-717,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science
关键词 PL-11血小板功能分析仪 血小板聚集率 参考区间 PL-11 platelet function analyzer platelet aggregation rate reference interval
作者简介 吴小利,1986年生,女,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:免疫与血栓止血。 通信作者:王成彬,教授,博士研究生导师,E—mail:wangcb301@126.com。
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Gurbel PA, Becker RC, Mann KG, et al. Platelet function monito- ring in patients with coronary artery disease[ J]. J AmColl Cardiol, 2007, 50 (19) : 1822-1834.
  • 2Bonello L, Camoin-Jau L, Arques S, et al. Adjusted clopidogrel loading doses according to vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation index decrease rate of major adverse cardiovascular e- vents in patients with clopidogrel resistance: a muhicenter random- ized prospective study [ J ]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2008, 51 (14) : 1404-1411.
  • 3Schafer A,Weinberger S, Flied U, et al. ADP-induced platelet ag- gregation frequently fails to detect impaired clopidogrel-responsive- ness in patients with coronary artery disease compared to a P2Y12- specific assay[ J]. Thromb Haemost, 2008,100(4) :618-625.
  • 4Gremmel T, Steiner S, Seidinger D, et al. Comparison of methods to evaluate clopidogrel mediated platelet inhibition after percutaneous intervention with stent implantation [ J ]. Thromb Haemost, 2009,101 (2) : 333-339.
  • 5Bal Dit Sollier C, Berge N, Boval B, et al. Functional variability of platelet response to clopidogrel correlates with P2Y(12) receptor oc- cupancy[J]. Thromb Haemost, 2009, 101 ( 1 ) :116-122.
  • 6Matetzky S, Fefer P, Shenkman B, et al. Effectiveness of reloading to overcome clopidogrel nonresponsiveness in patients with acute myo- cardial infarction[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2008, 102(5) : 524-529.
  • 7Lordkipanidze M, Pharand C, Schampaert E, et al. Evaluation of the platelet count drop method for assessment of platelet function in comparison with "gold standard" light transmission aggregometry [J]. Thrombosis Research, 2009, 124(4) : 418-422.
  • 8Breddin HK. Can platelet aggregometry be standardized? [ J ]. Platelets, 2005,16(3-4) :151-158.
  • 9LinnemannB, Schwonberg J, Mani H, et al. Standardization of light Lransmittanee aggregometry for monitoring antiplatelet therapy: an ad- iustment for platelet count is not necessary[ J]. J Thromb Haemost, >.008, 6(4) :677-683.

同被引文献55

引证文献8

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部