期刊文献+

几种去除牙面正畸残留粘结剂方法的效果评价 被引量:3

The experiment study of several resin-removal methods on enamel surface
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价几种方法去除残留粘结剂后对牙釉质表面的影响,为临床提供依据。方法挑选因正畸需要而拔除的健康前磨牙60颗。将其随机分成3组,第1组:碳钨钻+矽粒子组;第2组:超声洁治+矽粒子组;第3组:矽粒子组。每组20颗。并对处理后的牙面粗糙度差值、时间进行统计学检验。扫描电镜观察处理后的牙面形态。结果第1、2、3组处理前后的表面粗糙度差值有统计学意义(P<0.05)。处理时间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),第3组所用时间最长。扫描电镜观察,牙齿表面结构均有损伤。而第3组,表面损伤较浅,牙面的形态结构破坏较小。结论矽粒子是碳钨钻和超声洁治去除牙齿表面残留粘结剂的必要补充,能很好地保护牙齿表面的形态结构。 Objective To observe the effect of several residual adhesive methods on the enamel surface ,and conduct lab evalua-tion .Methods Sixty premolars extracted because of orthodontic treatment .And all the teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups . Group 1:tungsten carbide burs + silicon particles ;Group 2 :ultrasonic scaling + silicon particles ;Group 3:silicon particles ,each with 20 premolars .After underwent several methods ,the surface roughness differences ,operation time were determined and ob-served with the scanning electron microscope .And the result was statistically analyzed .Results There were significant differences in the surface roughness and operation time among the three groups (P〈0 .05) ,The scanning electron microscope after polishing showed that the teeth surface had different degrees of injury ,the silica particles group had less superficial scratch .Conclusion The tungsten carbide burs and ultrasonic instrument for debonding before the silica particles had less superficial scratch .
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第29期3503-3504,共2页 Chongqing medicine
关键词 表面粗糙度 扫描电镜 矽粒子 去粘结 碳钨钻 surface roughness scanning electron microscope silicon particles debonding tungsten carbide burs
作者简介 李有名(1974~),硕士,中级职称,主要从事口腔医学的研究。
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献41

  • 1刘雁.自酸蚀粘接剂与纳米全酸蚀粘接剂对充填体边缘微渗漏的影响[J].实用医技杂志,2008,15(4):426-427. 被引量:4
  • 2冯应宏,魏明波,陈建钢.Prime & BondNT粘结剂对银汞合金充填微渗漏及密合度的影响[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2005,21(1):30-32. 被引量:15
  • 3李正明,陈思韩,刘新强,陈杰,李宁毅.窝沟封闭剂对托槽周围微渗漏影响的实验研究[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2006,20(4):382-384. 被引量:3
  • 4Sanders NL. Evidence-based care in orthodontics and periodontics: a review of the literature [J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 1999, 130 (4) : 521-527.
  • 5Jordan C, LeBlanc DJ. Influences of orthodontic appliances on oral populations of mutans streptococci [J]. Oral Microbiol Immunol, 2002, 17(2): 65-71.
  • 6Matasa CG. Microbial attack of orthodontic adhesives[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1995, 108(2): 132-141.
  • 7Langendijk-Genevaux PS, Grimm WD, van-der-Hoeven JS. Sulfate reducing bacteria in relation with other potential periodontal pathogens [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2001, 28(12) : 1151-1157.
  • 8Paster BJ, Boches SK, Galvin JL, et al. Bacterial diversity in human subgingival plaque [J]. J Bacteriol, 2001, 183 (12) : 3770- 3783.
  • 9Ferrari M,Tay FR.Technique sensitivity in bonding to vital,acid-etched dentin[J].Operative Dentistry,2003,28 (4):3-8.
  • 10Bouillaguet S,Gysi P,Wataha JC,et al.Bond strength of composite to dentin usingconventional,one-step,and self-etching adhesive systems[J].Journal of Adhesive Dentistry,2001,29(1):55-61.

共引文献31

同被引文献21

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部