期刊文献+

信任是一种冒险行为吗?--实验经济学的检验 被引量:11

Is Trust a Risky Decision?A Study Based on Experimental Economics
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 信任是人们合作的基础,是建立社会秩序的主要工具之一,但信任行为总是和风险决策相关联的。本文运用实验经济学的方法,设计信任博弈、风险博弈、彩票对选择等实验测度人们的信任程度与风险态度,探讨风险态度对信任行为的影响程度,考察人们在自然风险状态下和人际交往风险状态下的决策行为。结果发现风险厌恶对信任行为有抑制作用,但二者是情景依赖的;与人际交往风险状态相比人们更喜欢自然风险状态,背叛厌恶心理导致信任程度的降低;不同性别被试的风险态度存在显著差异,进而影响他们的信任程度;利他偏好对信任行为有着重要的促进作用。 Trust which is the basis for cooperation is one of the important tools to establish social orders, and the trust behavior is always associated with risk decision-making. In a serious of experiments that focus on measuring the level of trust and the risk attitudes, we investigate the decision-making behaviors of people in the natural risk state and interper- sonal risk state, and discuss the degree that risk attitude influence on the trust behavior. Our experiments include trust game, risk game, lottery choice experiment. The results reveal that trust behavior is inhibited by the risk aversion, and the relationship of both is context dependent. When individuals make decisions, they have more trust in the outcomes of profit that determined by natural than the outcomes determined by the other party of the interpersonal contacts. Betrayal aversion leads to the reduction of the level of trust. We also find the significant relationship between the difference of gender and risk attitudes, and individuals' level of trust is different between the male and the female. Altruistic prefer- ences play an important role in promoting trust behavior.
出处 《预测》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第5期39-43,49,共6页 Forecasting
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71172068,70972086,71132001) 国家社会科学基金重大招标课题(10zd&035) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(10JJD630002) 长江学者和创新团队发展计划资助项目(PCSIRT)
关键词 信任 风险态度 背叛厌恶 实验经济学 trust risk attitudes betrayal aversion experimental economics
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Luhmann N. Trust and power [ M]. Chichester: JohnWiley & Sons Ltd, 1979. 16-27.
  • 2Williamson 0. Calculativeness, trust, and economicorganization.J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1993,36(1) ; 453-486.
  • 3Fehr E. On the economics and biology of trust [ J]. Journalof the European Economic Association, 2009 , 7(2-3):235-266.
  • 4Mayer R, Davis J, Schoorman F. An integrative model oforganizational trust [ J]. The Academy of ManagementReview, 1995,20(3) : 709-734.
  • 5Ben-Ner A, Putterman L. Trusting and trustworthiness[ J].Boston University Law Review, 2001, 81: 523-551.
  • 6Cook S,Cooper. Experimental studies of cooperation,trust, and social exchange. In 0strom E,Walker J,eds.Trust and Reciprocity [ M] . New York: Russell Sage,2003.209-244.
  • 7Barr A. Trust and expected trustworthiness; experimentalevidence from Zimbabwean villages [ J]. The EconomicJournal, 2003, 113: 614-630.
  • 8Bohnet I,Zeckhauser R. Trust, risk and betrayal [ J].Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2004,55:467-484.
  • 9Bohnet I,Greig F, Herrmann B, et al. . Betrayal aver-sion :evidence from Brazil,China, Oman, Switzerland,Turkey, and the United States [ J]. American EconomicAssociation, 2008 , 98(1) : 294-310.
  • 10Karlan D S. Using experimental economics to measuresocial capital and predict financial decisions[ J]. AmericanEconomic Review, 2005 , 95(5) : 1688-1699.

二级参考文献77

  • 1张维迎,柯荣住.信任及其解释:来自中国的跨省调查分析[J].经济研究,2002,37(10):59-70. 被引量:1048
  • 2李涛,李红.双方关系、关系网络、法院与政府:中国非国有企业间信任的研究[J].经济研究,2004,39(11):85-95. 被引量:20
  • 3李涛.社会互动、信任与股市参与[J].经济研究,2006,41(1):34-45. 被引量:214
  • 4杨国枢 见杨国枢 余安邦主编.《中国人的社会取向:社会互动的观点》[A].见杨国枢、余安邦主编.《中国人的心理与行为——观念及方法篇》[C].台北桂冠图书公司,1993年版..
  • 5[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104
  • 6[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June
  • 7[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972
  • 8[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321
  • 9[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619
  • 10[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182

共引文献8603

同被引文献199

引证文献11

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部