摘要
国际组织在传统知识国际保护方面条约编纂工作的进展缓慢,以及双边FTA谈判在成员国之间取得一致意见的相对容易性,致使持有传统知识和遗传资源的国家热衷于通过签署FTA建立国际传统知识保护制度。美国、中国以及欧盟在与拉美国家签署FTA时,分别持有反对、保持协商和积极赞同等三种不同阶段的立场;相反,与美国、欧盟以及中国签署FTA的拉美国家则在传统知识保护方面不断取得新进展。正确认识传统知识的未来战略意义,对领土内传统知识及其相关遗传资源宣布主权,建立传统知识数据库、完善相关国内法律制度是树立FTA战略的根本基础和保障。
Since the international organization is proceeding slowly with the compilation of treaties related to the protection of traditional knowledge on the international level, and it is comparatively easy for two member nations to achieve consensus in the FTA bilateral negotiation, countries with traditional knowledge and inherited resources are inclined to establish the international traditional knowledge protection system through signing FFA. In signing the FTA with Latin-American countries, the three entities, the U. S. , China and the EU, take three different stands, namely, objection, negotiation, and active support respectively. In contrast, the LatinAmerican countries, in signing the FTA with the three countries or regions, have been making steady progress in traditional knowledge protection. The following measures are the foundation and guarantee for the establishment of the FTA strategy： to correctly understand the future strategic significance of the traditional knowledge, to declare sovereignty over the traditional knowledge and inherited resource within the territory, as well as to construct a database of traditional knowledge and complete related domestic legal system.
出处
《上海大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第5期109-120,共12页
Journal of Shanghai University(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
上海市教委创新项目(10ZS42)
上海市浦江人才计划项目(沪人社外[2012]454
沪科合[2012]33)
关键词
自由贸易协定
传统知识
国家主权
惠益分享
free trade pact
traditional knowledge
national sovereignty
benefit sharing
作者简介
任虎（1973-），男，吉林龙井人。华东理工大学法学院副教授，法学博士，主要从事国际法、国际经济法研究。
