摘要
目的:对比分析腹腔镜和开腹手术在闭合性腹外伤并脾破裂中的治疗效果。方法:回顾我院2007年1月～2011年1月92例闭合性腹外伤并脾破裂(腹腔镜组42例,开腹组50例)的手术情况,对其临床资料进行统计、对比、分析。结果:腹腔镜组与开腹组比较,除手术时间、术中出血量无显著性差异外,下床活动时间、术后排气时间、术后疼痛程度、手术并发症率、切口长度、术后住院时间、平均住院费用等方面腹腔镜组明显优于开腹组。结论:与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜对闭合性腹外伤并脾破裂具有创伤小、恢复快、并发症少、住院时间短、费用少等的优点,治疗效果满意,是一种安全、可行、有效的手术方式。
Purpose Comparative analysis the therapeutic effect of spleen rupture in closed abdominal trauma.of laparoscopic and open operation..Method Review my courtyard from 2007 January to 2011 January 92 cases of splenic rupture in blunt abdominal trauma （42 cases of laparoscopy group, 50 cases of open group） operation, the clinical data were statistical, comparative, analysis. Results Comparison of laparoscopie and laparotomy group group, In addition to operation time, intraoperative blood loss without significant difference, bed activity time, Postoperative exhaust time, the degree of postoperative pain, operation complication rate, the length of the incision, the postoperative hospital stay, the average hospitalization expenses etc, Laparoscopic group were significantly better than open group. Conclusion Compared with open operation, laparoscopic in closed abdominal tramna and rupture has less trauma, quicker recovery,less complications, shorter hospitalization time, low cost and other advantages, curative effect satisfaction and is a safe. feasible, effective operation mode.
出处
《内蒙古中医药》
2013年第14期87-88,共2页
Inner Mongolia Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词
闭合性腹外伤
脾破裂
腹腔镜
对比分析
abdominal injury
rupture of spleen
laparoscopy
eomparative analysis
