期刊文献+

MMSE和MoCA对脑肿瘤患者认知功能评估的应用比较 被引量:15

Evaluation of cognitive function in patients with brain tumors: mini-mental state examination verse Montreal cognitive assessment scale
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究比较简易精神状态量表(MMSE)与中文版蒙特利尔认知评价量表(MoCA)在脑肿瘤患者认知障碍中的诊断筛查作用。方法对年龄、性别及教育水平构成无统计学差异的两组受试者在同一天内进行MoCA和MMSE评测,并逐一比较两组受试者各亚项得分以确定脑肿瘤患者的认知功能,比较两个量表对筛查脑肿瘤患者认知功能的差异。结果 308例脑肿瘤患者中,综合评估有认知障碍的139例,发生率45.1%;MoCA和MMSE对脑肿瘤患者认知功能障碍都具有初步的筛查作用。MoCA的敏感性为82.0%,特异性为92.7%。MMSE的敏感性为19.4%,特异性为100%。结论 MoCA敏感性高于MMSE,而特异性与MMSE相近,亚项设置较为复杂合理,能全面评价脑肿瘤患者的认知功能,更适合于具有广泛认知功能障碍的脑肿瘤患者。 Objective To compare the value of mini-mental state examination (MMSE) to assessment of cognitive function in patients with brain tumors with that of Montreal cognitive assessment scale (MoCA). Methods Three hundred and two patients with brain tumors (tumor group) and two hundred normal relatives of the patients with brain tumors (control group) were recruited in this study. The examinations of MMSE and MoCA were performed in the tumor group and control group. Then the scores of MMSE and MoCA were analyzed statistically. Results Both overall scores of MMSE and MoCA were significantly lower in tumor group than those in control group (P〈0.01). According to comprehensive evaluation including chief complains, MMSE, MoCA, comparison to c'ontrol group and physician assessment, the incidence of cognitive impairment was 45.1% (139/308) in tumor group. According to MoCA,'129 patients in tumor group had cognitive impairment, of whom 114 had cognitive impairment according to comprehensive evaluation and 15 not. The sensitivity and specificity of MoCA were 82.0% and 92.7% respectively. According to MMSE, 27 of 139 patients who had cognitive impairment in tumor group according to comprehensive evaluation, had cognitive impairment. The sensitivity and specificity of MMSE were 19.4% and 100% respectively. Conclusions The MoCA is more sensitive than the MMSE to screening cognitive impairment in patients with brain tumors although they have similar specificity. The setting of MoCA sub-items is more reasonable and suitable to evaluating cognitive function in patients with brain tumors.
出处 《中国临床神经外科杂志》 2013年第6期356-358,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Neurosurgery
基金 广东省科技计划项目(2011B031800107)
关键词 脑肿瘤 认知功能 MMSE MOCA Brain tumor Cognitive function Mini-mental state examination Montreal cognitive assessment scale
作者简介 通讯作者:周东,E—mail:zhoudong5413@163.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1余汉辉,周东,彭龙,詹升全,李昭杰,林志俊,林晓风,侯庆石.脑肿瘤患者认知功能障碍的研究[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2011,16(4):193-195. 被引量:21
  • 2侯庆石,周东,彭龙.脑肿瘤患者认知功能测评研究[J].中华神经外科杂志,2012,28(12):1290-1292. 被引量:6
  • 3张明园,Yu.,E.痴呆的流行病学调查工具及其应用[J].上海精神医学,1995,7(A01):1-62. 被引量:162
  • 4Nastreddine ZS, Phllips NA, Belirian V, et al. The Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment [J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2005, 53: 695- 699.
  • 5Petersen RC, Doody R, Kurz A, et al. Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment [J]. Arch Neurol, 2001, 58(12): 1985-1992.
  • 6Levisohn L, Cronin-Golomb A, Schmahmann JD. Neuropsy- chologieal consequences of cerebellar tumour resection in children: cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome in a pae- diatric population [J]. Brain, 2000, 123: 1041-1050.
  • 7Olson RA, Chhanabhai T, McKenzie M. Feasibility study of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA) in patients with brain metatases [J]. Support Care Cancer, 2008, 16: 1273- 1278.
  • 8Miotto EC, Junior AS, Silva CC, et al. Cognitive impairments in patients with low grade gliomas and high grade gliomas [J]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr, 2011, 69: 596-601.

二级参考文献35

  • 1吴丽慧,林晨,赵峰,诸葛启钏.儿童额叶肿瘤的执行功能评价[J].中华神经外科杂志,2005,21(9):524-526. 被引量:5
  • 2郑斌,彭彪,罗冬冬,陈凡凡.脑肿瘤病人的威斯康星分类作业测试指标(WCST)特点分析[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2006,11(6):253-255. 被引量:4
  • 3何淑华,静进.注意缺陷多动障碍儿童威斯康星卡片分类测验的临床价值[J].中国实用儿科杂志,2006,21(7):515-517. 被引量:16
  • 4Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment [J]. Am Geriatr Soc, 2005, 53(3): 695.
  • 5Meador KJ, Baker G, Cohen MJ, et al. Cognitive/behavioral teratogenetic effects of antiepileptic drugs [J]. Epilepsy Behav, 2007, 11 (3): 292-302.
  • 6Obrien JT, Erkinjuntti T, Reisberg B, et al. Vascular cognitive impairmem [J]. Lancet, 2003, 35(2): 89-92.
  • 7Reijneveld JC, Sitskoorn MM, Klein M, et al. Cognitive status and quality of life in patients with suspected versus proven low grade gliomas [J]. Neurology, 2001, 56 (5): 618- 623.
  • 8Goldstein B, Obrzut JE, John C, et al. The impact of frontal and non-frontal brain tumor lesions on Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance [J]. Brain Cogn, 2004, 54(2): 110- 116.
  • 9王正锋,陈劲草,孟肖利,李高义,雷霆.前交通动脉动脉瘤显微手术对认知功能的影响[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2007,12(7):424-426. 被引量:15
  • 10Levisohn L, Cronin-Golomb A, Sehmahmann JD. Neuropsychol- ogical consequences of cerebellar tumour resection in children: cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome in a paediatric population. Brain ,2000,123 : 104l -1050.

共引文献185

同被引文献160

引证文献15

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部