期刊文献+

基于制度质量视角的我国出口贸易区位选择影响因素研究——扩展引力模型的面板数据实证检验 被引量:62

Study on Influencing Factors of China’s Export Location Choice from Institutional Quality Perspective: An Empirical Test of Panel Data wit Augmented Gravity Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文从引力方程的微观基础出发,推导出包含制度质量的引力模型,进而把正式制度分为政治制度、经济制度和法律制度三大类共15个子指标,研究制度质量和我国出口贸易的关系,利用占我国对外贸易额85%以上的35个国家(或地区)1996-2011年的面板数据进行部分变量和全变量实证检验。所得结论验证了我国出口贸易偏好于经济发展水平比较高的国家(或地区)这一传统结论,同时认为我国的出口贸易对制度质量高的国家(或地区)也存在较强偏好,制度质量对我国出口贸易地理结构有重要影响,是影响我国出口贸易区位选择非常重要的因素。 By constructing a gravity model encompassing institutional quality with the micro basis of the gravity equation,this paper divides institutional system into three categories including political institution,economic institution and legal institution,which further point to 15 sub-indicators.Such a categorization is used to inspect the relationship between China’s institutional quality and its export trade.Panel data of 35 countries accounting for more than 85 percent of China’s export trade volume dated between 1996 and 2011 is empirically analyzed on both all variable and partial variable basis.The findings verify the orthodox argument that China’s export trade is superior to that of countries or regions at relatively higher levels of economic development.The results also show that China’s export trade has preferences for countries or regions of high institutional quality.This paper argues further that institutional quality has a significant impact on geographical pattern of China’s export trade,and it is a crucial factor that influences China’s choice of export trade location.
作者 谢孟军
出处 《国际贸易问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第6期3-15,共13页 Journal of International Trade
基金 国家社科基金重大项目"土地产权 土地流转与土地补偿制度研究"(课题号:11&ZD048)的阶段性成果
关键词 制度质量 微观基础 地理结构 区位选择 Institutional quality Micro basis Geographical pattern
作者简介 谢孟军:山东大学经济研究院(250100),山东工商学院国际商学院电子信箱:mjxie3@163.com。
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献80

  • 1史朝兴,顾海英.贸易引力模型研究新进展及其在中国的应用[J].财贸研究,2005,16(3):27-32. 被引量:66
  • 2潘向东,廖进中,赖明勇.进口国制度安排与高技术产品出口:基于引力模型的研究[J].世界经济,2005,28(9):3-16. 被引量:26
  • 3潘镇.制度质量、制度距离与双边贸易[J].中国工业经济,2006(7):45-52. 被引量:114
  • 4Angela Cheptea.Trade liberalization and institutional reforms[J].Economics of Transition,2007,15 (2).
  • 5James E.Anderson,Eric van Wineoop.Trade Costs[J].Journal of Economic Literature,2004,42 (3).
  • 6Oxana Koukhartchouk,Mathilde Maurel.Accession to the WTO and EU Enlargement:What po-Tential for Trade Increase?[R].CEPR Discussion Papers with Number,3944,2003.
  • 7David Dollar,Aart Kraay.Institutions,Trade,and Growth[J].Journal of Monetary Economies,2003,50.
  • 8Henri L.E de Groot,Gert-Jan Linders,Piet Rietveld,Uma Subramanian.The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns[J].Kyklos,2004,57 (1).
  • 9Wilson J S,Mann C,Otsuki T.Assessing the Potential Benefit of Trade Facilitation:a Global Perspective[R].World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3224,2004.
  • 10Srivastava,R.K.and Green,R.T.Determinants of Bilateral Trade Flows[J].The Journal of Business,1986,59 (4).

同被引文献689

二级引证文献342

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部