质量管理实践与企业绩效关系模型研究——扩展知识路径的研究视角被引量：20

A research on the relationship model between quality management practices and firm performance:expanding knowledge route’s perspective

原文传递

导出

摘要以战略管理理论中竞争优势来源的经典观点为依据,提出并分析了质量管理可以通过知识转移这一中间变量对企业绩效实施影响的逻辑路径,由此构建了质量管理与企业绩效关系的全模型。通过实证研究得出:质量管理实践对于知识转移具有显著影响作用以及传统路径和知识路径之间交互作用并不显著等主要结论。研究的主要意义:从内在逻辑解释了质量管理能够与创新活动相协调的理论依据,发展并完善质量管理与企业绩效关系模型,知识路径的存在为质量管理与知识管理两大实践体系的相互整合提供理论基础,也成为企业开展质量管理活动重要的决策依据。 Based on the traditional theory of strategic management for the source of competitive advantage,it propounds a logical route that quality management could affect firm performance through knowledge transfer.Then a full relationship model including traditional route and knowledge route is constructed.By an empirical study,it is concluded that quality management practices have a significant and strong effect on knowledge transfer and the interaction between logical route and knowledge route is insignificant.It illustrates internally theoretical foundation why quality management can coordinate with innovation activities.The conceptual model for the relationship between quality management practices and firm performance is developed.The existence of knowledge route constructs theoretical basis for integration between quality management practices and knowledge management practices.Furthermore the full model provides important decision basis for enterprise’s quality management practices.

作者姜鹏苏秦张鹏伟

机构地区西安交通大学管理学院

出处《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第6期904-912,共9页 Studies in Science of Science

基金国家自然科学基金资助项目(70872091)

关键词质量管理实践知识路径知识转移创新绩效企业绩效 quality management practices knowledge route knowledge transfer innovation performance firm performance

分类号 F270.7 [经济管理—企业管理]

作者简介姜鹏（1978-），男，浙江衢州人，博士，研究方向为质量管理与企业绩效评估。苏秦（1963-），女，回族，河南民权人，教授、博士生导师，研究方向为供应链与质量管理。张鹏伟（1985-），男，山西运城人，博士研究生，研究方向为质量管理与可靠性控制。

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献35

1Soura R, Voss C A. Quality management re - visited: a reflective review and agenda for future research [ J ]. Jour- nal of Operations Management, 2002, 20:91 -109.
2Nair A. Meta - analysis of the relationship between quality management practices and firm performance - implications for quality management theory development [ J ]. Journal of Operations Management, 2006, 24: 948 -975.
3Adam E, Corbett I, Flores B E, et al. An international study of quality improvement approach and firm perform- ance [ J ]. International Journal of Operations and Pro- duction Management, 1997, 9(17) : 842 - 873.
4Peng M W. Global Strategy [ M]. Mason: South - Western, 2006.
5Grant R M. Toward a knowledge - based theory of the firm [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17: 109 - 122.
6Spender J C. Making knowledge the basis of the dynam- ic theory of the firm [ J]. Strategic Management Jour- nal, 1996, 17:45-62.
7Gavin D. What does product really mean? [J]. Sloan Management Review, 1984, 25 - 43.
8Lakhal L, Pasin F, Limam M. Quality management practices and their impact on performance [ J]. Interna- tional Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 2006, 23 (6) : 625 - 646.
9Kaynak H, Hartley J L. A replication and extension of quality management into the supply chain [ J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2008, 26 (4) : 468 - 489.
10Tari J J, Molina J F, Castejon J L. The relationship be- tween quality management practices and their effects on quality outcomes [ J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 183(2) : 483 -501.