期刊文献+

形式与质料:知情同意的两个向度--兼谈知情同意形式主义 被引量:2

Form and Material:Two Dimensions of Informed Consent——Also on the Formalism of Informed Consent
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 形式与质料是生命伦理学知情同意原则存在的基本向度。普遍性的程序是知情同意形式层面的表现,行善的道德承诺是知情同意质料价值的彰显。在生命伦理实践中,知情同意出现了形式与质料的断裂:一方面,强调知情的形式或同意的程序性催生知情同意的形式主义;另一方面,强调知情同意的行善价值导致质料对形式的抛弃。只有完整地把握知情同意的合理内核,才能修复其质料与形式的割裂现象,进而实现二者的内在统一。 Form and material are basic dimensions of informed consent in bioethics. The form is universal procedure, while the mate- rial value is the moral promise of beneficence. In the practice of bioethics, there are rapture between form and material of informed consent. On one side ~ to stress the form of information or the program of consent leads to the formalism of informed consent. On the oth- er side, paying emphasis on the beneficial value brings about forsaking the form. The abnormal phenomena may not wholly master the reasonable core of informed consent; therefore, to achieve the intrinsic uniform of informed consent, it' s a must to repair the split be- twcen material and form.
作者 陈化
出处 《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期130-133,149,共5页 Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“中国语境下知情同意的伦理与法律问题研究”(11CZX057)阶段性成果
关键词 知情同意 形式与质料 知情同意形式主义 informed consent form and material formalism of informed consent
作者简介 陈化(1978-),男,湖南宜章人,博士,广州医科大学卫生管理学院副教授。
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Immanuel. Kant,Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals [ M].Hacket Publishing Company, 1993.
  • 2[德]康德.实践理性批判[M].北京:人民出版社,2003.
  • 3TomBeauchamp and J. F. Childress. Principles of Biomedical Ethics[M].5th,New York: Oxford University Ptess, 2001.
  • 4[美]H.T.恩格尔哈特.生命伦理学基础[M].北京:北京大学出版社.2006.242、22.
  • 5[美]约翰.罗尔斯.正文论[M].何怀宏,等译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2001.
  • 6Habermas. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Actionf M]. Poli-ty Press, 1990.
  • 7A.MacLean. Autonomy, Informed Consent and Medical Iw:A Re-lational Challenge [M]. 1 st,Cambridge University Prfess,2009.
  • 8[德]马克斯.舍勒.伦理学中的形式主义与质料的价值伦理学[M].倪梁康,译,北京:生活.读书.新知三联书店,2004.
  • 9亚里士多德 廖申白译.尼各马可伦理学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003..
  • 10E. D. Pellegrino and D. C. Thomasma. For the Patient . s Good: theRestoration of Beneficence in Health Care [ M]. Oxford University ftess,1998.

二级参考文献13

  • 1约翰·罗尔斯著 何怀宏等译.《正义论》[M].中国社会科学出版社,1988年版.第3、7—8、56页.
  • 2Sandy Elkin, "Informed Consent : Requirements for Legal and Ethical Practice", Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, Taylor & Francis, 2001, p. 103, p. 99, p. 104.
  • 3恩格尔哈特.《生命伦理学的基础》,范瑞平译,湖南科学技术出版社,1996,第316页.
  • 4罗伯特·K.默顿.《社会理论和社会结构》,唐少杰、齐心等译,译林出版社,2008,第301-302页.
  • 5Benjamin Freedman, "A Moral Theory of Informed Consent", The Hastings Center Report, Vol. 5, No. 4. 1975, p. 32, p. 37, p. 38, p. 33, p. 35, p. 35.
  • 6Celia B. Fisher, "Goodness-of-Fit Ethic for Informed Consent to Research Involving Aduhs with Mental Retardation and Development Disability", Mental Retardation and Develpmental Disabilities Research 9, Fordham University Center for Ethics Education, Bronx, New York, 2003, p. 29.
  • 7Alan A. Stone, "M. D. Informed Consent: Special Problems for Psychiatry", Hospital & Community Psychiatry, Vol. 30, No. 5, 1979, p. 333, p. 322, p. 322.
  • 8Sharon R. Kaufman, Janet K. Shim, and Ann J. Russ, "Revisiting the Biomedicalization of Aging: Clinical Trends and Ethical Challenges", The Gerontologist, Vol. 44, No. 6, 2004, p. 732.
  • 9菲力普·亚当克洛迪娜·赫尔兹里奇.《疾病与医学社会学》,王吉会译,2005,天津人民出版社,第49页.
  • 10Renate G. Justin, '" Perspective : Can a Physician Always Be Compassionate?", The Hastings Center Report, Vol. 30, No. 4. 2000, pp. 26 - 27, p. 27.

共引文献631

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部