摘要
个人权利和社会利益的均衡要求权利优化配置,而权利的优化配置有赖于当事人之间的交换意愿,因此纠纷的存在实际上是当事人无法自主配置权利的表现。司法解决纠纷的思路是以一般性标准来规定权利的客观价格,并且强制当事人接受,忽视个人主观价格,造成信息不对称以及交易费用过高等问题,因此无法促进权利的有效配置。调解从个别化角度出发采用补强信息并且尊重当事人主观价格的方法,更易于实现优化权利配置的交易市场功能。
The balance between individual rights and societal interests needs to optimize the allocation of rights,and the optimized allocation of rights depends on the exchange wish between the parties,so the existence of a dispute between the parties is in fact the performance of the parties who are unable to self configure rights.The idea of judicial settlement of disputes is based on regulating objective prices of rights under the general standards and forcing the parties to accept the results,resulting in the issues such as ignored personal subjective prices,information asymmetry and high transaction costs,which,therefore,cannot promote the effective configuration of rights.Mediation,starting from the perspective of individuals,reinforces information and respects the parties＇ subjective price method,which is easier to realize the trading market function of optimizing the allocation of rights.
出处
《广东商学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第3期91-97,共7页
Journal of Guangdong University of Business Studies
作者简介
李亚凝（1983－），男，山东德州人，厦门大学法学院诉讼法学博士研究生。
