期刊文献+

Braden-Q儿童压疮评估量表的预测性研究 被引量:22

Predictive study of Braden Q pediatric pressure ulcer risk assessment scale
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价Braden-Q儿童压疮危险评估量表(Braden-Q量表)对儿科重症患者发生压疮的预测效度。方法采用前瞻性队列研究设计方法,利用方便抽样在上海市三家儿童医院的重症监护室实际收集样本111例。由两名临床护士担任数据收集员,分别负责Braden-Q量表评分和皮肤评估,两者分别独立进行。结果实际发生压疮7例,发生率为6.3%。当Braden-Q量表评分为17分时认为有发生压疮的危险,即17分为预测临界值,此时灵敏度为0.571,特异度为0.365,量表的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.547。结论 Braden-Q量表对儿科重症患者发生压疮风险的预测效度一般,有待进一步改进完善。 Objective To evaluate the predictive validity of Braden Q pediatric pressure ulcer risk assessment scale (Braden-Q scale) in severe pediatric patients. Methods The prospective cohort study design was adopted, and 111 samples were collected from intensive care units of three pediatric hospitals in Shanghai with convenience sampling. Two nurses were appointed as the data collector, and were in charge of the scoring of Braden-Q scale and skin assessment. Results Seven patients (6.3%) developed pressure ulcers. The cutoff score of Braden-Q scale was 17 for the risk of pressure ulcer, with the sensitivity of 0. 571, specificity of O. 365 and area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0. 547. Conclusion The predictive validity of Braden-Q scale in severe pediatric patients is ordinary, and there is room for improvement.
出处 《上海交通大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期561-564,570,共5页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University:Medical Science
关键词 Braden—Q儿童压疮危险评估量表 压疮 预测效度 Braden Q pressure ulcer risk assessment scale pressure ulcer predictive validity
作者简介 陆晔峰(1985-),男,护师,硕士;电子信箱:yefenglutwo@126.com。
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Bohon L. Which pressure ulcer risk assessment scales are valid for use in the clinical setting? [ J ] J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2007, 34(4) : 368 -381.
  • 2Wu SS, Ahn C, Emmuns KR, et al. Pressure ulcers in pediatric patients with spinal cord injury: a review of assessment, prevention, and topical management [ J ]. Adv Skin Wound Care, 2009, 22 (6) : 273 -284.
  • 3Kwong E, Pang S, Wong T, et al. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in China's Mainland[J]. Appl Nuts Res, 2005, 18(2) : 122 - 128.
  • 4Defloor T, Grypdonck MF. Pressure ulcers: validation of two risk assessment scales [ J ]. J Clin Nuts, 2005, 14 ( 3 ) : 373 - 382.
  • 5Curley MA, Razmus IS, Roberts KE, et al. Predicting pressure ulcer risk in pediatric patients: the Braden Q Scale[ J ]. Nurs Res, 2003, 52(1): 22-31.
  • 6Barrett R, Tutfle V, Whalen E, et al. Pressure ulcers and nutritional support: a partnership to improve patient outcomes[ J]. J Nurs Care Qual, 2010, 25(2): 145-150.
  • 7McLane KM, Bookout K, McCord S, et al. The 2003 national pedi- atric pressure ulcer and skin breakdown prevalence survey: a multi- site study[J]. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2004, 31 (4): 168 - 178.
  • 8Cakmak SK, Gtil U, Ozer S, et al. Risk factors for pressure ulcers [Jl. Adv Skin Wound Care, 2009, 22(9) : 412 -415.
  • 9Smith BM, Guihan M, LaVela SL, et al. Factors predicting pressure ulcers in veterans with spinal cord injuries[ J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2008, 87(9) : 750 -757.
  • 10Wilborn D, Dassen T. Pressure ulcer prevention in German health- care facilities: adherence to national expert standard? [ J] J Nurs Care Qual, 2010, 25(2): 151 -159.

同被引文献194

引证文献22

二级引证文献253

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部