期刊文献+

所有权、负债与大股东利益侵占——来自中国控制权转移公司的证据 被引量:44

Corporate Ownership,Debt,and Expropriation——Evidence from Controlling Rights Transferred Firms
原文传递
导出
摘要 负债的公司治理作用是公司财务研究的重要问题。已有文献探讨了负债在股权分散公司中的公司治理作用,而在股权集中公司中负债对大股东与中小股东之间的代理问题的影响,已有的经验证据相当有限。本文以我国国有控制权转移上市公司为样本,研究了负债在股权集中公司中的治理作用。研究发现,负债与大股东的利益侵占存在显著正相关关系;相对于国有控股公司来说,私有公司的负债水平更高,其原因在于私有大股东通过负债对中小股东利益的侵占程度高于国有大股东。本文提供了负债与大股东利益侵占之间关系的直接证据,揭示了大股东通过负债侵占中小股东利益的行为,以及所有权性质对大股东通过负债侵占小股东利益行为的影响。 We provide direct evidence on the dark side of leverage and offer new insights regarding the role of debt in corporate governance.Using a sample of Chinese state-owned enterprises that have experienced a transfer of controlling rights,we find a positive and significant relationship between expropriation and debt usage.Firms controlled by private block shareholders tend to have higher leverage due to excessive expropriation via debt.The evidence we document provides fresh insights into the impact of debt on the agency problem between the controlling shareholder and minority shareholders,and suggests the presence of expropriation through debt and its conditional effect on corporate ownership.
出处 《会计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期66-72,96,共7页 Accounting Research
基金 国家社会科学基金(05CJY009) 国家自然科学基金(71025003)的研究成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1黄志忠.股权比例、大股东“掏空”策略与全流通[J].南开管理评论,2006,9(1):58-65. 被引量:68
  • 2马曙光,黄志忠,薛云奎.股权分置、资金侵占与上市公司现金股利政策[J].会计研究,2005(9):44-50. 被引量:191
  • 3Aussenegg, W., and R. Jelic. 2006. Operating Perform- ance of Newly Privatized Firms in Central European Transition Economies. Working Paper, Vienna University of Technology, Austria, and University of Birmingham, U. K.
  • 4Bathala, C. T., K. P. Moon, and R. P. Rao. 1994. Managerial Ownership, Debt Policy, and the Impact of Institu- tional Holdings: An Agency Perspective. Financial Manage- ment, 23 (3) : 38 -50.
  • 5Berkman, H., R. A. Cole, and J. L. Fu. 2009. Ex- propriation through Loan Guarantees to Related Parties: Evi- dence from China. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33 ( 1 ) : 141 - 156.
  • 6Boubaker, S. 2007. On the Relationship between Owner- ship - control Structure and Debt Financing: New Evidence from France. Working Paper, Universit- Paris XII Val de Marne - Institut de Recherche en Gestion.
  • 7Bozec, Y. , and C. Laurin. 2008. Large Shareholder En- trenchment and Performance: Empirical Evidence from Canada. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 35 ( 1 - 2 ) : 25 - 49.
  • 8Bradley, M., G. A. Jarrell, and E. H. Kim. 1984. On the Existence of an Optimal Capital Structure: Theory and Evi- dence. Jounaal of Finance, 39 (3) : 857 - 880.
  • 9Chen, D., M. Jian, and M. Xu. 2009. Dividends for Tunneling in a Regulated Economy: The Case of China. Pacific -Basin Finance Journal, 17 (2) : 209 -223.
  • 10Claessens, S., S, Djankov, and L. H. P. Lang. 2000. The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corpora- tions. Journal of Financial Economics, 58 (1 -2) : $1 - 112.

二级参考文献33

共引文献244

同被引文献689

引证文献44

二级引证文献300

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部