2Lassetn C, Bonedona V. Medical management of women with inherited predisposition to breast cancer: indicationsand procedures for m atom oaphic screening [ J . Bull Cancer,2001,88 (7) :677 - 686.
3Zonderland HM, Coerkamp EG, Hermans J, et al. Diagnosis of breast cancer:contribution of US as an adjunct tom atom ography[ J]. Radiolo- gy,1999,213(2) :413 -422.
4Kuhl CK, Schild HH Dynamic image interpretation of the breast [J]. J MRI, 2000,12(6):965-974.
5Schrading S, Kuhl CK, Mammographic US. MR imaging phenotypes of familial breast cancer [J]. Radiology,2008,246(1):58-70.
6Jansen SA, Newstead GM, Abe H, et al. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade [J]. Radiology,2007,245(3):684-691.
7Folman J. Tumor angiogenesis the rapeutic implications [J]. N Eng J Med, 1971,285(21):1182-1186.
8Daldrup Link HE, Rydland J, Helhich TH, et al. Quantification of breast tumor microvascular permeability with feruglose enhanced MR imaging: initial phase I1 multicenter trial [J]. Radiology,2003,22(9):885-891.
9Peters W, Smith D, Lugowski S, et al. Calcification properties of saline-filled breast implants. Plast Reconser Surg,2001,107(2):356-363.
10Le-Gal M, Chavance G, Pellier D. Diagnostic value of clustered microcalcifications discovered by mammography (apropos of 227cases with histological verification and without a palpable breast tumor). Bull Cancer, 1984, 71(1):57-64.
