期刊文献+

改进的稳健统计技术在排水检测人员技能评价中的应用

Application of Improved Robust Statistical Technique in Skill Evaluation of the Drainage Monitoring Analyst
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前排水检测行业中仍缺乏对技术人员进行技能评价的方法,或虽有评价方法,但方法存在不尽规范、合理等问题。稳健统计技术作为能力验证试验中广泛使用的结果评价方法,可消除异常数据的影响,使评价结果准确可靠。将稳健统计技术改进,作为技能评价要素中的一个分量,按照操作的准确性、规范性与熟练性三个方面评价排水检测人员检测数据结果,可以较科学、合理地反映检测人员的技能水平,为提高检测工作质量和实验室管理起到一定的借鉴作用。 At present there are still many problems of skill evaluation of drainage monitoring analyst in the drainage monitoring system, such as the methods of skill evaluation is deficiency, or not specification and reasonable. The robust statistical technique is a method which is widely used in proficiency testing. It can obtain accurate and reliable results by eliminating the influence of ab- normal data. An improved robust statistical technique was employed as one of the facts in the methods of skill evaluation. Comprehensive evaluation of the results of the testing data was based on the accuracy, normative, and proficiency of the operation, which can reflect the technique levels scientifically and rationally, and has certain reference function for improving the quality of the analysis and management of the laboratory.
出处 《中国环境管理干部学院学报》 CAS 2013年第2期8-10,共3页 Journal of Environmental Management College of China
关键词 稳健统计技术 排水检测 技能评价 能力验证 应用 robust statistical technique drainage monitoring skill evaluation proficiency testing application
作者简介 罗国兵(1979-),男,安徽太湖人,毕业于长安大学工业分析专业,工程师,现主要从事排水检测、实验室质量管理工作。
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献41

  • 1王承忠.实验室间比对的能力验证及稳健统计技术 第五讲 稳健统计技术(一)[J].理化检验(物理分册),2004,40(11):589-593. 被引量:58
  • 2黄涛.ISO/IEC 17025:2005《检测和校准实验室能力的通用要求》中存在的错误[J].电子质量,2006(11):56-58. 被引量:73
  • 3REIMANNA C, GARRETT R G. Geochemical background: concept and reality [ J ]. Sci Total Environ, 2005,350 : 12-27.
  • 4MATSCHULLAT J, OTTENSTEIN R, REIMANN C. Geochemical background: can we calculate it? [ J ]. Environ Geology, 2000, 39 (9) :990-1000.
  • 5HUBER P J. Robust statistics[ M ]. New York : Wiley, 1981.
  • 6李国英.稳健性概念浅说.数学的实践与认识,1983,(2):41-47.
  • 7REIMANN C, FILZMOSER P, GARRETT R G. Background and threshold: critical comparison of methods of determination [ J]. Sci Total Environ, 2005,346 : 1-16.
  • 8ROUSSEEUW P J, CROUX C. Alternatives to the median absolute deviation [J] .Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1993, 88 : 1273-1283.
  • 9MARONNA R A, MARTIN R D, YOHAI V J. Robust statistics theory and methods [ M ]. New York : Wiley, 2006 : 17-44.
  • 10梁小筠.正态性检验[M].北京:中国统计出版社,1996.

共引文献168

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部