期刊文献+

教学领导力:内涵、测评及未来研究方向 被引量:36

Instructional Leadership: Connotation,Assessment and the Future Researching Direction
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为中小学领导与管理领域的研究热点,教学领导力一直活跃于国外学校领导与管理研究、政策和实践中。基于历史性分析发现,教学领导力内涵的发展经历了由混沌到清晰,从注重客观工作分析到强调利益相关者主观建构,从以教学领导活动为线索到以学习为中心的过程。在测评方面,海林杰等人开发的校长教学领导力评定量表以及范德堡大学开发的以学习为中心的教学领导力评价体系影响较大。教学领导力未来的研究方向主要有:以全面发展理念作为研究指导;从校长教学领导力到共享教学领导力;提高研究的生态效度。 Instructional leadership is an important hotspot of studies in educational administration and management domain, which has been active in the research, policy and practice of foreign school leadership and management. Based on historical analysis, the instructional leadership connotation has evolved from chaos to clarity, from a focus on objective analysis to an emphasis on stakeholders subjective construction, from instructional leadership activities as a clue to the process of learning-centered. On the aspect of assessment, The Instructional Leadership Model and the Principals Instructional Leadership Management Rating Scale proposed by Hallinger and his colleague and the learning centered Vanderbilt Assessment of Leadership in Education proposed by Vanderbilt University have growing influence around the world. The future research direction can be included as follows: analyzing instructional leadership based on comprehensive development concept, transforming from instructional leadership of principals to shared instructional leadership, and improving the ecological validity of study.
作者 赵德成
出处 《外国教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期96-103,共8页 Studies in Foreign Education
关键词 教学领导力 中小学 学校改进 校长 instructional leadership primary and secondary schools school improvement principals
作者简介 赵德成(1971-),男,内蒙古赤峰人,北京师范大学教育管理学院副教授,博士生导师,教育学博士。
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Hallinger ,P . The Evolving Role of American Principals: From Managerial to Instructional to Translational Leaders[J].Journal of Educational Administration, 1992 , 30 (3 ): 35-48.
  • 2程晋宽.学校效能研究:理论、实践与争论[A].褚宏启.中国教育管理评论第4卷[C].北京:教育科学出版社,2007.
  • 3Southworth,G . Instructional Leadership in Schools: Reflections and empirical evidence[J]. School Leadership & Management, 2002 , 22 (1 ): 73-91.
  • 4Hallinger ,P . A Review of Three Decades of Doctoral Studies Using the Principal In?structional Management Rating Scale: A Lens on Methodological Progress in Educational Leadership[J]. Educational Administration Quarterly ,2011,47(2):271-306.
  • 5Ylimaki, R. M . Instructional Leadership in Challenging US Schools[J]. International Studies in Educational Administration, 2007 ,35 (3) : 11-19.
  • 6Murphy. Methodological , Measurement, and Conceptual Problems in the Study of Instruc?tional Leadership[J]. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1988,10(2): 117-139.
  • 7Hallinger .P, & Murphy .J . Assessing the instructional leadership behavior of princi?pals[J]. Elementary SchoolJournal, 1985 ,86 (2): 217-248.
  • 8Blase ,J. R. & Blase ,J. Handbook of Instructional Leadership: how really good principals promote teaching and learning[M]. Thousand Oaks,CA: Corwin Press, 1998.1-102.
  • 9Southworth ,G . Small successes: what lessons can be learned from successful heads of small primary?[J]. Managing Schools Today, 1999,9(2) :59-61.
  • 10J.墨菲,E.戈德林,S.艾略特,X.克雷文斯,A.波特.范德堡教育领导力评估:以学习为中心的评估方式[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2011,29(1):1-10. 被引量:14

二级参考文献3

共引文献49

同被引文献288

引证文献36

二级引证文献142

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部