3Brigitte Woelfer, Rehan Salim, Saikat Banejee, et al. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies detected by three-dimensional ultrasound screening. Obstet Gynecol, 2001,98(6) : 1099
4Jurkovic D, Asiam N. Three-dimensional ultrasound for diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies. In: Merz E. Ultrasound in obstetrics and Gynecology. Philadelphia: Williams Wilkins, 1998, 27
5Kupesic S, Kurjak A, Skenderovic S, et al. Screening for uterine abnormalities by three-dimensional ultrasound improves perinatal outcome. J Perinat Med, 2002, 30( 1 ) : 9
7Jurkovic D, Geipel A, Gruboeck K, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingographvand two-dimentional sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,1995,5(4) : 233
8Stray-Pedersen B, Stray-Pedersen S. Etiologic factors and subsequent reproductive performance in 195 couples with a prior history of habitual abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1984,148 : 140
9Gaucherand P, Awada A, Rudigoz RC. Obstetrical prognosis of the septate uterus: a plea for treatment of the septum. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,1994, 54:109
10Grimbizis GF,Camus M ,Tarlatzis BC,et al. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treament results. Hum Reprod Update,2001,7(2) : 161-174.
