期刊文献+

3种麻醉方式下乳腺癌改良根治术后恶心呕吐的发生率比较 被引量:2

Incidence comparison of post-operative nausea and vomiting of modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer under three methods of anesthesia
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨3种麻醉方式下乳腺癌改良根治术后恶心呕吐的发生率。方法对本院2009年3月~2012年12月收治的180例需要进行乳腺癌改良根治术的的患者分别使用3种不同的麻醉方法给予麻醉治疗,分为静脉全麻组、硬膜外麻醉组以及吸入全麻组,对3组麻醉方法的临床效果以及术后恶心呕吐发生率进行对比观察。结果硬膜外麻醉组患者在术后恶心呕吐发生率上明显低于静脉全麻醉和吸入全麻组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论患者进行乳腺癌改良根治术使用硬膜外麻醉术后恶心呕吐的发生率明显优于全身麻醉治疗,值得在临床麻醉中被广泛应用和推广。 Objective To discuss the incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting of modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer under three methods of anesthesia. Methods 180 patients who received the modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer in this hospital from March 2009 to December 2012 were randomly divided into the intravenous anesthesia group, epidural anesthesia group and inhalation anesthesia group, and compared the clinical effects and incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting. Results The incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting in the epidural anesthesia group was significantly lower than the one in the intravenous anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia group (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting ofepidural anesthesia for patients who receive the modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer is significantly better than the one of general anesthesia, which is worthy to be applied widely and popularized clinically.
作者 侯西永
出处 《中国医药科学》 2013年第6期101-102,共2页 China Medicine And Pharmacy
关键词 乳腺癌改良根治术 硬膜外麻醉 全身麻醉 术后恶心呕吐 Modified radical masteetmny for breast cancer Epidural anesthesia General anesthesia Post-operative nausea and vomiting
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献46

  • 1徐国柱,李晓玲,段砺瑕,朱天岳,谢启伟,周应芳,王冰,邓艳萍,沈黎阳,袁旭.氟比洛芬酯脂微球载体注射液治疗中度术后疼痛的Ⅱ期临床试验[J].中国新药杂志,2004,13(9):846-848. 被引量:258
  • 2段砺瑕,李晓玲.氟比洛芬酯注射液的药理作用及临床应用[J].中国新药杂志,2004,13(9):851-852. 被引量:602
  • 3李士通.喉罩临床应用相关问题[J].继续医学教育,2006,20(15):69-78. 被引量:37
  • 4卞新荣,赵海芳.氟比洛芬酯脂微球注射液及其临床应用[J].实用肿瘤学杂志,2007,21(2):173-175. 被引量:14
  • 5Beattie WS, Lindblad T, Buckley DN, et al. Menstruation increases the risk of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopy: a prospective randomized study. Anesthesiology, 1993, 78: 272-276.
  • 6Gratz I, Allen E, Afshar M, et al. The effects of the menstrual cycle on the incidence of emesis and efficacy of ondan setron. Anesth Analg, 1996, 83: 565-569.
  • 7Choi DH, Ko JS, Ahn HJ, et al. A Korean predictive model for postoperative nausea and vomiting. J Korean Med Sei, 2005, 20: 811-875.
  • 8Gan TJ. Risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg, 2006, 102; 1884-1898.
  • 9Apfel CC, Laara E, Koivuranta M, et al. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology, 1999, 91:693 700.
  • 10Gan TJ, Coop A, Philip BK, et al. A randomized, doubleblind study of granisetron plus dexamethasone versus ondan setron plus dexamethasone to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Anesth Analg, 2005, 101: 1323-1329.

共引文献75

同被引文献7

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部