期刊文献+

等效锥度的两种准线性计算方法的对比研究 被引量:5

Study of Two Quasi-linear Methods for Calculating the Equivalent Conicity
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 等效锥度是广泛用于表征轮、轨接触几何关系的重要参数之一,是轨道、车辆及多体动力学仿真计算、车辆运行性能评定或验收试验等主要指标。但是它不考虑接触的非线性特性,计算的不同结果使得目前国内技术交流和车辆运行性能评定结果不一致。现基于对等效锥度参数研究概述总结,对目前简化计算中常用的准线性化中的KLINGEL方法和Δr函数线性回归法进行对比分析,结合目前我国3种高速动车组轮、轨副(XP55,S1002CN和LMA)进行计算,并建议采用统一算法,为工程技术和理论研究奠定基础。 The equivalent conicity is one important parameter that used to characterize the wheel/rail contact geometry, and is the key indicators in the track, vehicles and multi-body dynamics simulation, and also in the vehicle's performance evaluation or acceptance testing. But it does not take into account the nonlinear contact influence, and different reduction algorithms cause that technological ex changes and the vehicle's performance evaluation results are inconsistent. Based on the overview of the parameters of the equivalent conicity, This article presents the contrast and comparative analysis of the two calculations of quasi-linear function of KLINGEL and the linear regression of the rolling radii difference function At, also shows the influence of the contact nonlinearities on the wheel/rail contact geometry with the calculation of three CRH wheel/rail pairs(XP55, S1002CN and LMA) used the two methods, and also recommended that a unified algorithm should be adopted in order to lay a good foundation for engineering practice and theory research.
出处 《铁道机车车辆》 2013年第1期53-58,共6页 Railway Locomotive & Car
基金 国家基础研究发展计划(973项目)(2011JL711104) 铁道部科技研究开发项目(2011J001) 国家自然科学基金(51005075) 华东交通大学校立科研基金(10JD12)
关键词 等效锥度 非线性接触 KLINGEL算法 半径差函数线性回归法 equivalent conicity nonlinear contact KLINGEL the linear regression of the rolling radii difference function △r
作者简介 林凤涛(1977-)男,内蒙古赤峰人,博士研究生
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1杨国桢.磨耗形踏面的轮轨接触几何参数[J].铁道车辆,1980,10:6-12.
  • 2张剑,金学松,孙丽萍,张军.基于CRH5型高速动车组车辆的轮对动态特性与等效锥度关系初探[J].铁道学报,2010,32(3):20-27. 被引量:18
  • 3陈厚嫦,黄体忠,王群伟,黄成荣.轮对内侧距对机车车辆动力学性能影响的试验研究[J].中国铁道科学,2006,27(5):99-103. 被引量:17
  • 4Cooperrider,N. K.,Law,E. H.,Hull, R.,Kadala, P.S.,Tuten, J. M. , Analytical and Experimental Determi-nation of Nonlinear Wheel/Rail Geometric Constraints[R]. U. S. DOT Report No. FRA-OR&-D 76/244,De-cember 1975.
  • 5Stephen’Handal.成型和磨耗车轮的锥度[C],第十一届国际轮轴会议,1995.
  • 6Filippo Attivissimo,Angelo Danese, Nicola Giaquinto. ATechnique to Charactererize the Wheel-Rail Interaction byMeans of a Diagnostic Railway Vehicle [C]. IEEE IMTC2004-lnstmmenlation and Measurement Technology Con-ference Como, 2004.
  • 7O. Polach, A. Vetter. Methods for running stability pre-diction and their sensitivity to wheel/rail contact geometry[C]. Extended Abstracts of the 6th International Confer-ence on Railway Bogies and Running Gears, Budapest.
  • 8O. Polach. Comparability of the non-linear and linearizedstability assessment during railway vehicle design [J].Veh. Syst. Dyn. 44 (Suppl. ),2006.
  • 9Standard for Definition and Measurement of Wheel TreadTaper[C]. 17. APT A SS-M-017-06, APTA CommuterRail Executive Committee,2006.
  • 10EN 14363. Railway applications-Testing for the Accept-ance of Running Characteristics of Railway Vehicles-Tes-ting of Running Behaviour and Stationary Tests [ S],CEN,Brussels, 2005.

二级参考文献20

  • 1臧其吉,黄成荣,范钦海.高速动力车磨耗型车轮踏面的参数研究[J].中国铁道科学,1994,15(4):1-7. 被引量:8
  • 2Goodall R M, Iwnicki S D. Non-linear dynamic techniques v. equivalent conicity methods for rail vehicle stability assessment[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2004,41(Suppl) : 791-799.
  • 3Shevtsov I Y, Markine V L, Esveld C. Optimal design of wheel profile for railway vehicles[J].Wear, 2005, 258(7-8):1022-1030.
  • 4Markine V L, Shevtsov I Y, Esveld C. An inverse shape design method for railway wheel profiles[J]. Struct Multidisc Optim, 2007, 33:243-253.
  • 5Shevtsov I Y, Markine V L, Esveld C. Design of railway wheel profile taking into account of rolling contact fatigue and wear[J].Wear, 2008, 265(9-10):1273-1282.
  • 6Jahed H, Farshi B, Eshraghi M A,et al. A numerical optimization technique for design of wheel profiles [J]. Wear, 2008, 264(1-2)~1-10.
  • 7Wickens A H. The dynamics of railway vehicles - from Stephenson to Carter[J]. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part F: J. Rail and Rapid Transit, 1998, 212(3) :209-217.
  • 8Wickens A H. Fundamentals of rail vehicle dynamics: guidance and stability [ M]. Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers, 2003, 1-18.
  • 9Pearce T G. Wheelset guidance-conicity, wheel wear and safety[J]. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part F.. J. Rail and Rapid Transit, 1996, 210(4):1-9.
  • 10BS EN 13715 Railway Applications-Wheelsets and Bogies- Wheels-Wheels Tread[S]. London: British Standards Institution, 2006.

共引文献33

同被引文献21

引证文献5

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部