摘要
从基本概念、基本用途、口径范围、资料来源和计算方法、数据表现等方面阐述资金流量表中的居民可支配收入与住户调查中的居民可支配收入之间的区别,支出法GDP中的居民消费与住户调查中的居民消费之间的区别,以及支出法GDP中的固定资本形成总额与投资统计中的全社会固定资产投资之间的区别,可以揭示出,住户调查中的居民收入和居民消费数据存在一定程度的低估,投资统计中的全社会固定资产投资数据存在一定程度的高估,并没有直接影响到对中国国民可支配收入在居民、企业、政府三者之间的分配结构和最终需求结构等重大经济结构的准确判断。
This study examines the differences between the residents' disposable income in the fund flow statement and that in the household survey,between the residents' consumption in expenditure-based GDP and that in the household survey,and between the gross fixed capital formation in expenditure-based GDP and the total investment in fixed assets in statistics,in terms of basic concepts,use,scope,source of materials,computational methods and data presentation.Our study reveals that the data on residents' income and consumption in the household survey have been undervalued,whereas the data on total investment in fixed assets in statistics have been overvalued.However,they have not immediately affected the accurate assessment of great economic structures such as the distribution structure of Chinese people's disposable income among residents,enterprises and the government,and the final demand structure.
出处
《中国社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第2期4-24,204,共21页
Social Sciences in China
