摘要
目的：研究院前急救不同评价方法对院前急救患者诊治效果的影响。方法：将2010年6月－2012年6月110倒患者分为两组，对照组依据病史、症状、体征等做出急救诊断；研究组依据院前指数法（Pre—hospitalIndex，PHI）做出急救诊断。对比两组现场救治、转运及延续抢救效果。结果：此次实验中，与对照组相比，研究组在现场迅速做出了明确的诊断，成功实现了现场救治和转运及急诊科延续性治疗，研究组和对照组进行比较后，差异有统计学意义，研究组的救治成功率高于对照组采用生理指标进行评分。结论：院前创伤评分应用量化和权重对受伤程度进行判断，提高急诊救治有效率，尽量降低了患者病死率和残痰率，正确的院前评分系统对指导急诊医师进行临床救护有重要的意义。
Objective：Institute of Emergency different evaluation methods of diagnosis and treatment of patients with pre--hospital Methods： June 2010 to June 2012, 110 patients were divided into two groups, based on history, symptoms, signs, etc. to make a first--aid diagnosis; Study Group index （Pre--hospital Index, PHI） based on pre--hospital trauma scoring system trauma score to make first aid diagnosis. Compare the two sets of on--slte treatment, transporters, and the continuation of the rescue effect. Result：The experiment, compared with the control group, the study group at the scene quickly make a clear diagnosis, sueeessful implementation of on--site treatment and transit and emergency medicine eontinulty of treatment, the study group and the eontro｜ group were eompared, the difference statistically significant, the study group treatment success rate was higher physiological index score. Conclusion： Pre--hospital trauma the rated application quantify and weight on the degree of injury judgment, improve emergency treatment efficiency, minimize patient mortality and disability rates, correct pre--hospital scoring system to guide emergency physicians significance to clinical care.
出处
《按摩与康复医学》
2012年第33期44-45,共2页
Chinese Manipulation and Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词
院前急救
创伤评分
诊治效果
Pre--hospital first aid Trauma score Diagnosis and treatment
作者简介
黄志强（1976-），男，主治医师，研究方向：急救创伤。
