期刊文献+

保护区周边农户对绿色农业认知度分析 被引量:5

Local households' perceptions of green agriculture
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了检验当地居民参与绿色农业项目前后生产生活的变化以及他们对"绿色水稻项目"(Green Rice Project,GRP)的认知度,包括对收益、成本、保护意识以及经济补偿费用的认知,我们分析了2004年和2011年陕西朱鹮(Nipponia nippon)自然保护区周边社区3个村919份绿色水稻项目的农户调查问卷。结果表明:就3个村子整体而言,参与项目后,农户实际生活水平提高了,农户对此认知是一致的。农户对成本的认知与对保护意识的认知受经济发展水平影响不显著(P>0.05),普遍认为绿色水稻种植的各种成本增加了,但他们对朱鹮及其栖息地具有积极的保护意识。然而,农户对收益的认知和对经济补偿的大部分认知受经济水平的影响显著(P<0.05)。如果农户的基本生计没有得到保障,农户更多关心的是自己的生存问题,对参与GRP项目的农户而言,在一定时期内直接关注的必然是参与项目带来的现实经济收益和政府实际补助水平。因此,政府要建立健全野生动物肇事经济补偿机制,这是解决保护区与社区之间矛盾的根本途径。 To test changes in livelihood and perception of local residents after the implementation of green agriculture, 919 questionnaires were distributed to households in three Green Rice Project (GRP) pilot villages in the Crested Ibis National Nature Reserve (CINNR) 2004 and 2011. Our results showed that local households' benefits were improved and most perceptions of cost and protection awareness were not significantly influenced by economic level (P 〉 0.05). Although the GRP increased all costs of rice farming, the public were willing to protect the Crested Ibis habitat. However, most of their perceptions of benefits and economic compensation were significantly influenced by economic levels (P 〈0.05). Despite those advantages, the GRP also has problems, such as unguaranteed funding sources, discontinuous techniques and financial support for follow-up industries. This study indicates that households will care more about their livelihood if their basic requirements are in doubt. Lastly, households participating in GRP tended to be more interested in the economic benefits from GRP, compared to households that were not enrolled in the GRP.
出处 《生物多样性》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期735-744,共10页 Biodiversity Science
基金 林业公益性行业专项课题(201204201)
关键词 当地农户 认知度 绿色水稻项目 生态补偿 参与式保护 朱鹮 自然保护区 local residents, perceptions, Green Rice Project, ecological compensation, participatory conservation, the Crested Ibis National Nature Reserve
作者简介 通讯作者:崔丽娟.E-mail:lkyclj@126.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Allendorf TD (2007)Residents’ attitudes toward three pro-tected areas in southwestern Nepal. Biodiversity and Con-servation, 16, 2087—2102.
  • 2Bajracharya SB, Furley PA, Newton AC (2005)Effectivenessof community involvement in delivering conservation bene-fits to the Annapurna conservation area, Nepal. Environ-mental Conservation, 32, 1-9.
  • 3Baral N,Stern MJ (2011)A comparative study of two commu-nity-based conservation models in Nepal. Biodiversity andConservation, 20, 2407—2426.
  • 4Bauer H (2003)Local perceptions of Waza National Park,northern Cameroon. Environmental Conservation, 30, 175-181.
  • 5Bergquist DA (2007)Sustainability and local people’s partici-pation in coastal aquaculture: regional differences and his-torical experiences in Sri Lanka and the Philippines. Envi-ronmental Management, 40,787-802.
  • 6Ding CQ (2010)Crested Ibis. Chinese Birds, 1,156-162.
  • 7靳乐山,郭建卿.农村居民对环境保护的认知程度及支付意愿研究——以纳板河自然保护区居民为例[J].资源科学,2011,33(1):50-55. 被引量:36
  • 8Karanth KK, Nepal SK (2012)Local residents perception ofbenefits and losses from protected: areas in India and Nepal.Environmental Management, 49, 372-386.
  • 9Khadka D,Nepal SK (2010)Local responses to participatoryconservation in Annapurna conservation area, Nepal. Envi-ronmental Management, 45,351-362.
  • 10罗辉,梁建忠,黄晓园.自然保护区及周边社区利益主体的博弈分析[J].贵州大学学报(社会科学版),2010,28(1):62-66. 被引量:6

二级参考文献68

共引文献182

同被引文献88

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部