摘要
在民间借贷纠纷中,一般认为借条具有既证明借贷合意存在又证明出借人已履行款项交付义务的证明作用。在原告持有借条的情况下,若被告不能举证证明自己的还款事实,从表面上看,则法官似乎可以理所当然地支持原告的诉求。然而,现实生活千姿百态,实践中民间借贷纠纷不乏各种错综复杂的情形,在这种情况下,要想准确认定案件事实就必须诉诸法官的自由心证。
In the folk lending disputes ,it is generally acknowledged that IOUs not only play a role for me consensus between borrowers and lenders, but also prove that lenders have delivered money to the borrowers. If the plaintiff holds the IOU and the accused can＇t prove that he has returned the money he borrowed, superficial- ly, the judge can of course support the plaintiffs claim. However, real life is different and complicated. There are all kinds of folk lending disputes in practice. As a result, the judge would have to apply the free proof to de- termine the facts.
出处
《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》
2012年第4期103-106,共4页
Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
关键词
民间借贷
纠纷
自由心证
经验法则
Folk Lending Disputes
Free Proof
Empirical rules
作者简介
王崇蓉（1988-），女，湖北成宁人，2010级诉讼法学专业硕士研究生。
