期刊文献+

护理行为六维度量表中文版的信效度分析 被引量:12

Reliability and validity analysis of six dimension scale of nursing performance
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨护理行为六维度量表(6-D量表)中文版的信效度,检验其是否适合我国使用。方法采用探索性因素分析、重测信度、内在一致性信度和分半信度对6-D量表进行信度与效度检验。结果对中文版6-D量表进行探索性因子分析,提取了特征值大于1的公因子5个,其累积方差贡献率达到52.293%,内部一致性Cronbach’sα系数、分半系数分别为0.948,0.816,重测信度系数ICC为0.857;除了第8,13,30条目,中文版6-D量表几乎所有的条目在6个因子中都得到了较为充分的表达,均落入所归属的维度中。结论中文版6-D量表被验证具有较好的信效度,适用于我国文化背景下临床护士的能力测评。 Objective To analyze the reliability and validity of 6-D scale of nursing performance, and examine whether it is suitable in China. Methods Exploratory factor analysis, test-retest reliability, internal consistency reliability and split-half reliability were used to examine the reliability and validity of the 6-D scale. Results Exploratory factor analysis of Chinese 6-D scale and 5 common factors whose eigenvalue was bigger than 1 showed that, the accumulative contribution rate was 52. 293% , the internal consistency coefficient Cronbach' s αwas 0. 948, half coefficient was 0. 816, and ICC test-retest reliability coefficient was 0. 857. Except for entry 8, 13 and 30, all other entries in Chinese 6-D scale were well expressed in 6 factors and fell in its dimension. Conclusions 6-D scale is verified with a good reliability and validity for evaluating nurses' clinical competence in China.
作者 刘国云 杨辉
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2012年第20期2373-2375,共3页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
关键词 护理评价研究 6-D量表 信度 效度 Nursing evaluation research 6-D scale Reliability Validity
作者简介 通信作者:刘国云,Email:liuguoyunyun@163.com.
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1David T. Cowan Competence in nursing practice: a controversial concept-a focused review of literature. Accid Emerg Nuts ,2007,15 (4) :20-26.
  • 2Meretoja R, Leino-Kilpi H. Instruments for evaluating nurse competence. J Nurs Adm,2001,31 (7) :346-352.
  • 3吴明隆.统计应用SPSS实务.北京:科学出版社,2003:64-65.

同被引文献136

引证文献12

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部