摘要
目的比较产后抑郁筛查量表（PDSS）和爱丁堡产后抑郁量表（EPDS）在产后抑郁筛查中的应用价值。方法采用PDSS、EPDS及美国精神障碍诊断与统计手册第4版轴Ⅰ障碍定式临床检查患者版（SCID—I／P）同时对445名产后6周的妇女进行评定，以SCID—I／P作为产后抑郁诊断金标准。结果两种量表的临界值分别为74分和10分。PDSS的灵敏度（93．33％）和特异度（94．75％）的组合较好。PDSS与EPDS的ROC曲线下面积分别为0．978和0．872，差异均有统计学意义（P均〈0．05）。结论与EPDS相比，PDSS具有较好的筛检价值，是早期发现产后抑郁患者的简单、快速、准确的筛查工具。
Objective To compare the value of the Postpartum Depression Screening Scale （PDSS） and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale （EPDS） in the screening of postpartum depression. Methods A total of 445 women within 6 weeks postpartum completed PDSS, EPDS and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders-Patient Edition （SCID-I/P）. The SCID-I/P was regarded as the gold standard for postpartum depression diagnosis. Results The cut-off score for PDSS and EPDS was 74 and 10, respectively. PDSS achieved the higher combination of sensitivity （93.33%） and specifity （94.75%）. The area under the curve for PDSS and EPDS was 0.978 and 0. 872, respectively （ P 〈 0.05 ）. Conclusions Compared with EPDS, PDSS has a higher screening value. It is a simple, fast and accurate screening tool for postpartum depression.
出处
《中华现代护理杂志》
2012年第19期2274-2276,共3页
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
关键词
产后抑郁
筛查
产后抑郁筛查量表
爱丁堡产后抑郁量表
Postpartum depression
Screening
Postpartum depression screening scale
Edinburgh postnatal depression scale
作者简介
通信作者：刘梅，Email：liumei80538@163．com
