摘要
历史上,管仲无礼的观点占上风。然而从《管子》及相关原典出发进行考察,管仲不仅有完整严谨的礼的理论,也有各方面实施礼的行动。管仲被指责为无礼的事件主要是:礼遇与君主相同、辅助纠以后又辅助小白、献戎捷,然而依据礼的原则和规定衡量,管仲并没有违礼。在多方面分析的基础上得出了管仲知礼的结论。
The views that Guanzhong had the lack of Propriett prevailed for quite a long time in Chinese history.However,the research from Guanzi and the other relative classics showed that Guanzhong had not only the complete and precise theory of Propriety,but also the actions of implementation from all aspects.The main affairs that he was blamed as Impropriety were the same as the courteous reception with his monarch,assisting Xiaobai after assisting Jiu,offering war captures respectfully to Lu but not the king of Zhou.But according to the main principles and rules of Propriety,he did not violate it.The comprehensive analysis brought to the conclusion that Guanzhong had the idea of Propriety.
出处
《西南大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第4期151-155,176,共5页
Journal of Southwest University(Social Sciences Edition)
作者简介
管正平，上饶师范学院朱子学研究所，上饶师范学院文学与新闻传播学院，讲师。
