期刊文献+

认知方式问卷中文版在大学生中的试用 被引量:8

Reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of Cognitive Style Questionnaire in college students
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:建立认知方式问卷(CSQ)中文版,并分析信效度。方法:按量表翻译程序将CSQ翻译成中文,选取647名大学生进行CSQ中文版的测量。随机抽取其中130名大学生于初评后1个月进行重测,并与功能失调态度问卷(DAS)比较,评估与抑郁症状的相关性。结果:CSQ中文版共72个条目,分为评估原因、评估结果、评估自我认知及评估内在归因4个维度;总量表的Cronbachα系数为0.95,重测信度为0.82,各分量表的α系数在0.71~0.80之间;条目间平均相关系数在0.24~0.42之间。验证性因子分析显示数据拟合良好(GFI=0.90,CFI=0.92,IFI=0.91,RMSEA=0.07)。4个因子间标准路径数为0.47~0.98,因子内部标准路径系数0.60~0.91。CSQ单独及与DAS一起进入回归都对抑郁症状有显著相关((β=0.22,0.20,均P<0.01),而DAS只单独进入时对抑郁症状有显著相关性(β=0.15,P<0.01)。结论:认知方式问卷中文版具有良好的信效度。与功能失调态度问卷比较,认知方式问卷中文版与抑郁症状的相关性可能更高。 Objective: To develop a Chinese version of the Cognitive Style Questionnaire (CSQ)and evaluate its reliability and the validity. Methods: The original version of the CSQ was translated into Chinese version and administered to 647 Chinese college students. Totally 130 students were re-tested one month later. The CSQ was compared with the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS) to analyze the relation to depression symptom. Results: The internal consistency reliability of the total scale was 0. 95, and those of the four subscales ranged from 0. 71 to 0. 80. The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0. 82. The mean inter-item correlation coefficient for the factors ranged from 0. 24 to 0. 42. The factors loadings ranged from 0.47 to 0. 98. The results of confirmatory factor analyses (GFI = 0. 90, CFI = 0. 92, IFI = 0. 91, RMSEA = 0. 07) indicated that the four-factor structure of the CSQ was suitable for the Chinese sample. In comparison the DAS to correlation of depression indicates that the CSQ always made a unique, significant contribution in correlativity variance to the depression (β = 0. 22, 0. 20; Ps 〈 0. 01), even after variance attributable to the DAS (β = 0. 15, P 〈 0. 01) had been explained. Conclusion: It suggests that the Chinese version of the Cognitive Style Questionnaire (CSQ) has good reliability and validity. Comparing with DAS, the CSQ might have better correlation with depression.
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期135-138,共4页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
关键词 抑郁 认知方式问卷 功能失调态度问卷 信度 效度 心理测量学研究 depression Cognitive Style Questionnaire (CSQ) Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS) reliability validity psychometric studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Hankin BL, Abramson LY. Development of gender differences in depression An elaborated cognitive vulnerability-transactional stress theory [ J]. Psycbol Bul, 2001,127(6):773 -796.
  • 2Beck AT. Cognitive therapy: A 30-year retrospective [ J]. Am Psychol, 1991,46(2) : 368 - 375.
  • 3Abramson LY, Metalsky GI, Alloy LB. Hopelessness depression a theory-based subtype of depression [ J]. Psychol Rev, 1989, 96(2): 358 - 372.
  • 4Weissman M. Mediators and moderators of change in cognitive therapy of depression [J]. Psychol Bul, 1993, 114(2):248 -265.
  • 5Alloy LB, Abramson LY, Hogan ME, et al. The Temple-Wisconsin Cognitive Vulnerability to Depression (CVD) Project Lifetime his- tory of Axis I psychopathology in individuals at high and low cog- nitive risk for depression [J]. J Abs Psychol, 2000, 109(3) : 403 - 418.
  • 6Haeffel A, Brandon E, Gerald I. et al. Measuring cognitive vulnera- bility to depression: Development and validation of the cognitive style questionnaire [ J]. Clin Psychol Rev 2008, 28(7) : 824 - 836.
  • 7陈远岭,徐俊冕,严善明,冼易平,李一云,常晓棠,梁国祥,马振祥.功能失调性状况评定量表信度和效度初步研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1998,12(5):265-267. 被引量:62
  • 8Seligman ME, Abramson LY, Semmel A, et al. Depressive attributional style [ J]. J Abs Psychol, 1979, 88(2) : 242 - 250.
  • 9刘平.流调中心用抑郁量表.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:200-202.
  • 10Wadsworth ME, Rieckmann T, Benson MA, et al Coping and responses to stress in NAVAJO adolescents: psychometric properties of the responses to stress questionnaire [J]. J Comm Psychol, 2004, 32(4) : 391 -411.

二级参考文献1

共引文献65

同被引文献110

引证文献8

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部