摘要
目的:建立认知方式问卷(CSQ)中文版,并分析信效度。方法:按量表翻译程序将CSQ翻译成中文,选取647名大学生进行CSQ中文版的测量。随机抽取其中130名大学生于初评后1个月进行重测,并与功能失调态度问卷(DAS)比较,评估与抑郁症状的相关性。结果:CSQ中文版共72个条目,分为评估原因、评估结果、评估自我认知及评估内在归因4个维度;总量表的Cronbachα系数为0.95,重测信度为0.82,各分量表的α系数在0.71~0.80之间;条目间平均相关系数在0.24~0.42之间。验证性因子分析显示数据拟合良好(GFI=0.90,CFI=0.92,IFI=0.91,RMSEA=0.07)。4个因子间标准路径数为0.47~0.98,因子内部标准路径系数0.60~0.91。CSQ单独及与DAS一起进入回归都对抑郁症状有显著相关((β=0.22,0.20,均P<0.01),而DAS只单独进入时对抑郁症状有显著相关性(β=0.15,P<0.01)。结论:认知方式问卷中文版具有良好的信效度。与功能失调态度问卷比较,认知方式问卷中文版与抑郁症状的相关性可能更高。
Objective: To develop a Chinese version of the Cognitive Style Questionnaire (CSQ)and evaluate its reliability and the validity. Methods: The original version of the CSQ was translated into Chinese version and administered to 647 Chinese college students. Totally 130 students were re-tested one month later. The CSQ was compared with the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS) to analyze the relation to depression symptom. Results: The internal consistency reliability of the total scale was 0. 95, and those of the four subscales ranged from 0. 71 to 0. 80. The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0. 82. The mean inter-item correlation coefficient for the factors ranged from 0. 24 to 0. 42. The factors loadings ranged from 0.47 to 0. 98. The results of confirmatory factor analyses (GFI = 0. 90, CFI = 0. 92, IFI = 0. 91, RMSEA = 0. 07) indicated that the four-factor structure of the CSQ was suitable for the Chinese sample. In comparison the DAS to correlation of depression indicates that the CSQ always made a unique, significant contribution in correlativity variance to the depression (β = 0. 22, 0. 20; Ps 〈 0. 01), even after variance attributable to the DAS (β = 0. 15, P 〈 0. 01) had been explained. Conclusion: It suggests that the Chinese version of the Cognitive Style Questionnaire (CSQ) has good reliability and validity. Comparing with DAS, the CSQ might have better correlation with depression.
出处
《中国心理卫生杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2012年第2期135-138,共4页
Chinese Mental Health Journal
关键词
抑郁
认知方式问卷
功能失调态度问卷
信度
效度
心理测量学研究
depression
Cognitive Style Questionnaire (CSQ)
Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS)
reliability
validity
psychometric studies